Baldwin's Alleged Recklessness on 'Rust' Set Exposed in Court Docs

Submitted by MAGA

Posted 4 days ago

Shocking new court documents reveal Alec Baldwin's alleged reckless behavior on the set of "Rust" before the fatal shooting of Halyna Hutchins.

According to prosecutors, Baldwin engaged in horseplay with his gun and fired a blank round at a crew member shortly before the tragic incident. The prosecutors claim that Baldwin flouted security protocols and ignored safety procedures, including holding his finger on the trigger in scenes and rushing the armorer to reload his gun faster.

The prosecution plans to present evidence of Baldwin's alleged reckless behavior to the jury when his involuntary manslaughter trial starts next month. The court documents also claim that Baldwin asked to be assigned the "biggest" gun available before the filming of "Rust" even started.

Baldwin's financial situation is reportedly getting worse as he faces up to 18 months in prison for Hutchins' shooting. He has recently listed his $19 million Hamptons home and is allegedly contemplating a venture into reality television, providing viewers a glimpse into his life with his wife and seven children. However, his financial expectations might be posing challenges to turning this Hollywood daydream into a reality.


Baldwin is a vocal Trump-hater and a darling of the left, but his problems are only getting bigger as he faces charges for the accidental fatal shooting of Hutchins. As things stand, Baldwin could end up behind bars, and many would tune in for "Alec's Big House."

In other news, US District Judge Aileen Cannon has demanded Jack Smith reveal the extent of Merrick Garland's influence in Trump's classified documents case. During a session on Friday, Judge Cannon's inquiries appeared to catch Smith's prosecutors off guard, according to Politico. When asked about the level of communication between Garland and the special counsel, Smith’s deputy, James Pearce, responded that he was "not authorized" to discuss the specifics.

Trump's attorneys contended that Smith's appointment by Garland was unconstitutional, asserting that Smith lacked the legal authority to prosecute the case. They argued that only an officer appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate should possess the authority Smith holds.

Judge Cannon's line of questioning seemed aimed at clarifying the degree of Smith's independent authority. Pearce and Smith’s team argued that Smith's appointment was a lawful exercise of Garland's discretion in organizing the Justice Department. Pearce emphasized that Smith's actions were "in compliance" with longstanding Justice Department rules and regulations.

Friday was the first of a three-day sequence of hearings that will continue on Monday and conclude on Tuesday. On Monday, the hearing will center on claims by Trump’s team that Smith is being improperly funded by the Justice Department.

Cannon was randomly assigned to preside over Trump’s classified documents case after Smith charged the former president last June. Cannon is a 2020 Trump appointee but has not given a clear indication of how she intends to rule in the case.

Sources:
revolver.news
thepostmillennial.com
glennbeck.com