Fauci's Beagle Experiments: NIH Misled the Washington Post
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 5 hours ago
In a startling revelation, the Washington Post has finally acknowledged that it was misled by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) regarding Anthony Fauci’s controversial beagle experiments.
The admission comes after years of scrutiny led by the White Coat Waste Project (WCW), which uncovered disturbing practices where beagles were subjected to inhumane testing in Tunisia.
Fauci, who previously served as the face of the NIH during the pandemic, has been under fire for his involvement in these cruel experiments.
Internal documents obtained by WCW reveal that Fauci not only funded the project but also engaged in a concerted effort to mislead both media outlets and the public about its legitimacy.
This admission aligns with the testimony given by Fauci himself before Congress, where he confirmed he signed off on the testing.
Critics have long pointed out that Fauci's approach to animal testing came at the cost of taxpayer dollars and raised ethical concerns about the treatment of animals under his watch.
In reaction to the WCW’s initial findings, the NIH scrambled to deflect blame by disseminating disinformation through major news outlets, including the Washington Post, to protect Fauci’s reputation.
The report now suggests that the Post's earlier articles aimed at discrediting the WCW were merely vehicles of the NIH’s misinformation campaign.
Documents have shown that as public outrage mounted over these findings, Fauci expressed concern over the backlash and the protests targeting his offices.
This revelation not only sheds light on the troubling practices endorsed by Fauci but also raises serious questions about accountability at federal health institutions.
As the Trump Administration emphasizes transparency and accountability in government spending, the fallout from this scandal could serve to highlight the need for reform in how taxpayer money is utilized, particularly in areas of ethical animal treatment.
For many, this serves as a stark reminder of the need to question governmental authority and hold agencies accountable for their actions.
The spotlight is now on Congress as officials promise to push for reforms that prevent inhumane treatment of animals in government-funded research.
Fauci, despite stepping down, remains a symbol of the larger issues surrounding wasteful spending and lack of oversight in federal programs.
With more investigations likely on the horizon, the call for a more responsible and ethical approach to animal testing is gaining traction among lawmakers and the public alike.
As advocates continue to campaign for accountability, it’s evident that the legacy of Fauci’s controversial decisions will linger as part of a broader discussion about the integrity of scientific research and the ethical treatment of all sentient beings.
Sources:
blog.whitecoatwaste.org
thefederalist.com
endtimeheadlines.org
The admission comes after years of scrutiny led by the White Coat Waste Project (WCW), which uncovered disturbing practices where beagles were subjected to inhumane testing in Tunisia.
Fauci, who previously served as the face of the NIH during the pandemic, has been under fire for his involvement in these cruel experiments.
Internal documents obtained by WCW reveal that Fauci not only funded the project but also engaged in a concerted effort to mislead both media outlets and the public about its legitimacy.
This admission aligns with the testimony given by Fauci himself before Congress, where he confirmed he signed off on the testing.
Critics have long pointed out that Fauci's approach to animal testing came at the cost of taxpayer dollars and raised ethical concerns about the treatment of animals under his watch.
In reaction to the WCW’s initial findings, the NIH scrambled to deflect blame by disseminating disinformation through major news outlets, including the Washington Post, to protect Fauci’s reputation.
The report now suggests that the Post's earlier articles aimed at discrediting the WCW were merely vehicles of the NIH’s misinformation campaign.
Documents have shown that as public outrage mounted over these findings, Fauci expressed concern over the backlash and the protests targeting his offices.
This revelation not only sheds light on the troubling practices endorsed by Fauci but also raises serious questions about accountability at federal health institutions.
As the Trump Administration emphasizes transparency and accountability in government spending, the fallout from this scandal could serve to highlight the need for reform in how taxpayer money is utilized, particularly in areas of ethical animal treatment.
For many, this serves as a stark reminder of the need to question governmental authority and hold agencies accountable for their actions.
The spotlight is now on Congress as officials promise to push for reforms that prevent inhumane treatment of animals in government-funded research.
Fauci, despite stepping down, remains a symbol of the larger issues surrounding wasteful spending and lack of oversight in federal programs.
With more investigations likely on the horizon, the call for a more responsible and ethical approach to animal testing is gaining traction among lawmakers and the public alike.
As advocates continue to campaign for accountability, it’s evident that the legacy of Fauci’s controversial decisions will linger as part of a broader discussion about the integrity of scientific research and the ethical treatment of all sentient beings.
Sources:
blog.whitecoatwaste.org
thefederalist.com
endtimeheadlines.org
Latest News