Wisconsin Supreme Court Race: Left’s Radical Agenda Unveiled
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Radical Left’s Influence on Wisconsin Supreme Court Race Exposed**
As the politically charged atmosphere in Wisconsin heats up, the race for the state Supreme Court has emerged as a critical battleground that encapsulates the rising influence of the radical left.
Dane County Circuit Judge Susan Crawford is under scrutiny as she faces off against conservative candidate Brad Schimel in the upcoming election, and the financial backing she has received tells a compelling story.
Crawford, who touts herself as a "fair and impartial" jurist, has a long list of endorsements and financial support from some of the most influential leftist figures and organizations in the country.
Significantly funded by radical billionaires like George Soros and J.B. Pritzker, she has accumulated over $7.7 million in campaign contributions since launching her candidacy.
This financial backing, however, raises serious questions about her commitment to impartiality on the bench.
Many of Crawford’s major supporters are pushing agendas that should concern every Wisconsin resident.
Advocates for defunding the police, abortion on demand, and even controversial "gender-affirming care" for minors are among her key funders.
These groups expect a return on their investment should Crawford win, as they aim to maintain a liberal majority on the court already teetering at 4-3.
For context, her opponent, Judge Schimel, has raised more than $5 million in contributions as he seeks to return conservative values to Wisconsin’s highest court.
Schimel's supporters highlight their candidate’s dedication to upholding the principles that have historically benefitted Wisconsin residents, including economic freedom and individual rights.
Yet Crawford’s campaign carries with it the weight of past controversies and systemic biases ingrained in her supporters' platforms.
Notably, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has long been the legal landscape shaping the trajectory of policies that directly impact everyday lives, making this election a pivotal moment.
The investment from far-left organizations hints at a concerted effort to steer the court in a direction that could prioritize progressive ideologies over the rule of law.
Crawford’s association with groups promoting divisive policies, such as those advocating for the dismantling of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the radical changes to law enforcement, is alarming.
The upcoming April 1 election is set to be the most expensive state judicial race in history, signaling just how serious these leftist agendas are taken by those pumping money into Crawford's campaign.
As the campaign unfolds, voters will have to consider whether they want a judicial system swayed by radical ideology or one that upholds conservative principles and serves the interests of all Wisconsinites.
Wisconsin citizens are encouraged to pay attention, as the outcomes of this race will have repercussions far beyond the state, influencing the national landscape as well.
In this crucial election, the stakes have never been higher, with the future of Wisconsin's judiciary—and its impact on broader national policies—hanging in the balance.
Sources:
theguardian.com
theamericanconservative.com
thefederalist.com
As the politically charged atmosphere in Wisconsin heats up, the race for the state Supreme Court has emerged as a critical battleground that encapsulates the rising influence of the radical left.
Dane County Circuit Judge Susan Crawford is under scrutiny as she faces off against conservative candidate Brad Schimel in the upcoming election, and the financial backing she has received tells a compelling story.
Crawford, who touts herself as a "fair and impartial" jurist, has a long list of endorsements and financial support from some of the most influential leftist figures and organizations in the country.
Significantly funded by radical billionaires like George Soros and J.B. Pritzker, she has accumulated over $7.7 million in campaign contributions since launching her candidacy.
This financial backing, however, raises serious questions about her commitment to impartiality on the bench.
Many of Crawford’s major supporters are pushing agendas that should concern every Wisconsin resident.
Advocates for defunding the police, abortion on demand, and even controversial "gender-affirming care" for minors are among her key funders.
These groups expect a return on their investment should Crawford win, as they aim to maintain a liberal majority on the court already teetering at 4-3.
For context, her opponent, Judge Schimel, has raised more than $5 million in contributions as he seeks to return conservative values to Wisconsin’s highest court.
Schimel's supporters highlight their candidate’s dedication to upholding the principles that have historically benefitted Wisconsin residents, including economic freedom and individual rights.
Yet Crawford’s campaign carries with it the weight of past controversies and systemic biases ingrained in her supporters' platforms.
Notably, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has long been the legal landscape shaping the trajectory of policies that directly impact everyday lives, making this election a pivotal moment.
The investment from far-left organizations hints at a concerted effort to steer the court in a direction that could prioritize progressive ideologies over the rule of law.
Crawford’s association with groups promoting divisive policies, such as those advocating for the dismantling of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the radical changes to law enforcement, is alarming.
The upcoming April 1 election is set to be the most expensive state judicial race in history, signaling just how serious these leftist agendas are taken by those pumping money into Crawford's campaign.
As the campaign unfolds, voters will have to consider whether they want a judicial system swayed by radical ideology or one that upholds conservative principles and serves the interests of all Wisconsinites.
Wisconsin citizens are encouraged to pay attention, as the outcomes of this race will have repercussions far beyond the state, influencing the national landscape as well.
In this crucial election, the stakes have never been higher, with the future of Wisconsin's judiciary—and its impact on broader national policies—hanging in the balance.
Sources:
theguardian.com
theamericanconservative.com
thefederalist.com
Latest News