King County's Deportation Ban Overturned: Federal Authority Wins
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 9 hours ago
**Court Blitz: King County's Deportation Ban Overturned in Major Ruling**
In a stunning reaffirmation of federal authority, a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has decisively put an end to King County's attempts to obstruct the deportation of illegal immigrants.
This decisive legal victory for the Trump administration is a clear reminder that local jurisdictions cannot flout federal immigration law.
The saga began in 2018 when King County officials, led by Czar Dow Constantine, arrogantly declared they would no longer allow federal ICE agents to operate out of Boeing Field to deport illegal aliens.
Constantine's edict came amidst a growing wave of anti-ICE sentiment from local activists, seeking to transform the county into a sanctuary for illegal immigrants.
Despite being told repeatedly by federal courts to cease their illegal activities, the county persisted, only to find themselves on the wrong side of the law once again.
In a move that perfectly encapsulates the misguided antics of progressives in the West Coast, the 9th Circuit panel did not hold back in its scathing appraisal of King County's actions.
The court ruled not only that Constantine’s directives lacked any legal grounding but also expressed incredulity at the county's failure to recognize the supremacy of federal law.
The ruling emphasized that King County had tried to drown out the federal government with a sea of legal maneuvering, ultimately falling flat in its arguments against ICE’s operations.
Importantly, the decisions articulated by Judge Daniel A. Bress—appointed by former President Trump—reinforced the principle that local governments cannot prioritize their policies over federal enforcement efforts.
The court stated, “King County’s arguments fail,” and noted that its attempts to obstruct federal immigration activities were “discriminatory” and unlawful.
With this ruling, the 9th Circuit has effectively sent a message to similar jurisdictions: The federal government's authority in immigration matters is not up for local negotiation.
As the nation braces for greater enforcement measures under a potential second Trump presidency, this decision signals an impending shift toward stricter adherence to immigration laws.
King County thought it could stand against the tide of federal policies, but in the end, the law—and common sense— prevailed.
Under the guidelines established by the constitution and federal law, all eyes will now be on how local governments adjust their stances in light of this precedent.
As enthusiasm builds for Donald Trump's return to the Oval Office and his promises to ramp up border security, the ruling serves as a crucial warning to those who seek to undermine immigration law at the local level.
Sources:
meduza.io
pjmedia.com
dallasexpress.com
In a stunning reaffirmation of federal authority, a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has decisively put an end to King County's attempts to obstruct the deportation of illegal immigrants.
This decisive legal victory for the Trump administration is a clear reminder that local jurisdictions cannot flout federal immigration law.
The saga began in 2018 when King County officials, led by Czar Dow Constantine, arrogantly declared they would no longer allow federal ICE agents to operate out of Boeing Field to deport illegal aliens.
Constantine's edict came amidst a growing wave of anti-ICE sentiment from local activists, seeking to transform the county into a sanctuary for illegal immigrants.
Despite being told repeatedly by federal courts to cease their illegal activities, the county persisted, only to find themselves on the wrong side of the law once again.
In a move that perfectly encapsulates the misguided antics of progressives in the West Coast, the 9th Circuit panel did not hold back in its scathing appraisal of King County's actions.
The court ruled not only that Constantine’s directives lacked any legal grounding but also expressed incredulity at the county's failure to recognize the supremacy of federal law.
The ruling emphasized that King County had tried to drown out the federal government with a sea of legal maneuvering, ultimately falling flat in its arguments against ICE’s operations.
Importantly, the decisions articulated by Judge Daniel A. Bress—appointed by former President Trump—reinforced the principle that local governments cannot prioritize their policies over federal enforcement efforts.
The court stated, “King County’s arguments fail,” and noted that its attempts to obstruct federal immigration activities were “discriminatory” and unlawful.
With this ruling, the 9th Circuit has effectively sent a message to similar jurisdictions: The federal government's authority in immigration matters is not up for local negotiation.
As the nation braces for greater enforcement measures under a potential second Trump presidency, this decision signals an impending shift toward stricter adherence to immigration laws.
King County thought it could stand against the tide of federal policies, but in the end, the law—and common sense— prevailed.
Under the guidelines established by the constitution and federal law, all eyes will now be on how local governments adjust their stances in light of this precedent.
As enthusiasm builds for Donald Trump's return to the Oval Office and his promises to ramp up border security, the ruling serves as a crucial warning to those who seek to undermine immigration law at the local level.
Sources:
meduza.io
pjmedia.com
dallasexpress.com
Latest News