Calls Grow for Moratorium on mRNA Vaccine Administration
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 6 hours ago
The alarming shortcomings of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have come under fresh scrutiny, with a new peer-reviewed study calling for a moratorium on their administration.
A group of researchers has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and long-term effects of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccines, underscoring a growing chorus of voices demanding immediate action.
The study, highlighted by leading health experts, points out that crucial toxicology and long-term efficacy trials were either poorly conducted or absent altogether.
Authors of the study stress that these vaccines, often misclassified as traditional vaccines, should be viewed as gene therapy products.
This significant reclassification is essential, as gene therapies face more stringent regulatory requirements.
The researchers argue that the spike protein produced by these vaccines poses serious risks, including potential long-term neurological damage.
Moreover, they found alarming evidence of a high mortality rate associated with the initial rollout of these vaccines, raising questions about the oversight and regulatory failures that permitted their widespread use.
Key figures, including Florida's surgeon general and other medical professionals, have joined the call for a pause on the mRNA vaccines.
This plea for a moratorium comes amid mounting evidence linking mRNA vaccines to adverse health outcomes, particularly concerning neurological issues.
Medical professionals and researchers alike caution against downplaying these risks, arguing that transparency and accountability are crucial in public health policy.
As momentum grows for a reevaluation of these vaccines, it's apparent that the public deserves clear, unfiltered information regarding their risks and benefits.
The time has arrived for a serious discussion on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations, prioritizing the health and well-being of individuals over political or corporate interests.
The compelling data presented in this recent study cannot be overlooked; it represents a critical juncture in our understanding of mRNA vaccine safety.
It’s a moment where conservative voices advocating for patient safety and informed consent can push for systematic changes in how vaccines are rolled out and monitored.
The administration of these vaccines must be reassessed in light of new scientific evidence, ensuring that health standards are upheld and that public trust in medical institutions can be restored.
Sources:
alexberenson.substack.com
dailysignal.com
childrenshealthdefense.org
A group of researchers has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and long-term effects of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccines, underscoring a growing chorus of voices demanding immediate action.
The study, highlighted by leading health experts, points out that crucial toxicology and long-term efficacy trials were either poorly conducted or absent altogether.
Authors of the study stress that these vaccines, often misclassified as traditional vaccines, should be viewed as gene therapy products.
This significant reclassification is essential, as gene therapies face more stringent regulatory requirements.
The researchers argue that the spike protein produced by these vaccines poses serious risks, including potential long-term neurological damage.
Moreover, they found alarming evidence of a high mortality rate associated with the initial rollout of these vaccines, raising questions about the oversight and regulatory failures that permitted their widespread use.
Key figures, including Florida's surgeon general and other medical professionals, have joined the call for a pause on the mRNA vaccines.
This plea for a moratorium comes amid mounting evidence linking mRNA vaccines to adverse health outcomes, particularly concerning neurological issues.
Medical professionals and researchers alike caution against downplaying these risks, arguing that transparency and accountability are crucial in public health policy.
As momentum grows for a reevaluation of these vaccines, it's apparent that the public deserves clear, unfiltered information regarding their risks and benefits.
The time has arrived for a serious discussion on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations, prioritizing the health and well-being of individuals over political or corporate interests.
The compelling data presented in this recent study cannot be overlooked; it represents a critical juncture in our understanding of mRNA vaccine safety.
It’s a moment where conservative voices advocating for patient safety and informed consent can push for systematic changes in how vaccines are rolled out and monitored.
The administration of these vaccines must be reassessed in light of new scientific evidence, ensuring that health standards are upheld and that public trust in medical institutions can be restored.
Sources:
alexberenson.substack.com
dailysignal.com
childrenshealthdefense.org
Latest News