Congress Urges WHO to Disband Transgender Guidelines Group
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
The World Health Organization (WHO) finds itself under scrutiny as twenty-nine U.S. Congress members have issued a strong demand for the disbandment of its Guideline Development Group (GDG) on transgenderism.
Led by Representatives Rich McCormick and Senator Roger Marshall, both medical doctors, the lawmakers argue that the GDG’s actions resemble a “global marketing campaign” rather than an objective evaluation of medical evidence.
Their letter raises alarming concerns about the integrity and transparency of the panel, highlighting potential conflicts of interest and a troubling lack of unbiased scientific assessment.
Many members of the GDG are reportedly affiliated with the World Professional Association for Transgender Healthcare (WPATH), a group accused of manipulating data to push a socially progressive agenda.
Previous lawsuits against WPATH have revealed attempts to suppress research that presents unfavorable results regarding cross-sex hormone treatments. Such revelations raise serious questions about the credibility of the guidelines being developed.
The Congress members assert that the GDG has skipped crucial steps in assessing the effectiveness and safety of medical interventions for gender dysphoria, opting instead to focus on how countries can implement these interventions.
“Why would the GDG recommend procedures that are shrouded in controversy and scientific dispute?” the lawmakers inquire. The letter indicates that WPATH’s motivations include financial gain, leading to pressures on insurance companies to cover these interventions, which are not substantiated by solid evidence.
The WHO’s position on transgender surgeries and gender ideology has drawn criticism from various quarters, especially when viewed through the lens of traditional American values. Items like abortion and LGBTQ+ ideology are perceived by many as efforts to undermine the foundational moral principles of the nation.
Senator Marshall has gone further, arguing that this is yet another reason why the United States should reconsider its financial ties to the WHO. His remarks resonate with many who believe the global health body has strayed from its mission to uphold health standards in pursuit of a politically charged agenda.
Critics argue that these actions not only compromise the integrity of scientific guidelines but also pose risks to individuals who might make irreversible decisions based on incomplete or misleading information.
As this situation unfolds, it raises broader questions about who truly informs health policy on a global scale and whether that information is based on sound science or ideological belief.
The push by these lawmakers signals a growing demand among conservatives for greater accountability and a return to protective, evidence-based healthcare practices in the United States, reflecting an urgent desire for reform at institutions perceived as endorsing a progressive, activist agenda.
Sources:
internationalman.com
harbingersdaily.com
naturalnews.com
Led by Representatives Rich McCormick and Senator Roger Marshall, both medical doctors, the lawmakers argue that the GDG’s actions resemble a “global marketing campaign” rather than an objective evaluation of medical evidence.
Their letter raises alarming concerns about the integrity and transparency of the panel, highlighting potential conflicts of interest and a troubling lack of unbiased scientific assessment.
Many members of the GDG are reportedly affiliated with the World Professional Association for Transgender Healthcare (WPATH), a group accused of manipulating data to push a socially progressive agenda.
Previous lawsuits against WPATH have revealed attempts to suppress research that presents unfavorable results regarding cross-sex hormone treatments. Such revelations raise serious questions about the credibility of the guidelines being developed.
The Congress members assert that the GDG has skipped crucial steps in assessing the effectiveness and safety of medical interventions for gender dysphoria, opting instead to focus on how countries can implement these interventions.
“Why would the GDG recommend procedures that are shrouded in controversy and scientific dispute?” the lawmakers inquire. The letter indicates that WPATH’s motivations include financial gain, leading to pressures on insurance companies to cover these interventions, which are not substantiated by solid evidence.
The WHO’s position on transgender surgeries and gender ideology has drawn criticism from various quarters, especially when viewed through the lens of traditional American values. Items like abortion and LGBTQ+ ideology are perceived by many as efforts to undermine the foundational moral principles of the nation.
Senator Marshall has gone further, arguing that this is yet another reason why the United States should reconsider its financial ties to the WHO. His remarks resonate with many who believe the global health body has strayed from its mission to uphold health standards in pursuit of a politically charged agenda.
Critics argue that these actions not only compromise the integrity of scientific guidelines but also pose risks to individuals who might make irreversible decisions based on incomplete or misleading information.
As this situation unfolds, it raises broader questions about who truly informs health policy on a global scale and whether that information is based on sound science or ideological belief.
The push by these lawmakers signals a growing demand among conservatives for greater accountability and a return to protective, evidence-based healthcare practices in the United States, reflecting an urgent desire for reform at institutions perceived as endorsing a progressive, activist agenda.
Sources:
internationalman.com
harbingersdaily.com
naturalnews.com
Latest News