Harris Campaign's Polling Flops Expose Major Misalignment
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Revelations of Flawed Campaigning: Harris’ Internal Polling Disastrously Misleading**
In a troubling admission that sends shockwaves through the Democratic camp, senior advisor David Plouffe has revealed that Kamala Harris’ internal polling never showed her ahead of Donald Trump, contrary to the myriad public polls suggesting otherwise.
This revelation, confirmed during a podcast appearance, indicates that the Harris campaign was living in a state of denial, having invested a staggering $1 billion while grossly overestimating its electoral standing.
Plouffe stated, “We didn’t get the breaks we needed on Election Day,” reinforcing a narrative of complacency and mismanagement that has unfortunately become a hallmark of recent Democratic campaigns.
Despite an overwhelming volume of cash spent on the campaign, including hefty contributions from various donors, it appears that internal panic consumed strategists long before Harris ever stepped on a debate stage. Plouffe's remarks expose a disconnect between the Harris campaign’s optimistic public messaging and the sobering realities captured in their internal assessments.
Moreover, this miscalculation is not an isolated incident. Pollster Ann Selzer, a veteran in the industry, was significantly off the mark, predicting a narrow win for Harris in Iowa only to see Trump prevail by an imposing 13-point margin. Such discrepancies raise serious questions about the competency of those tasked with guiding Democratic candidates through the electoral landscape.
As a result of this chaotic campaign run, the Republican Party capitalized on what has been one of their most successful election cycles since 2004. Trump's ability to rally support is reflected in the fact that he won the popular vote and decisively claimed every critical swing state.
Internal polling mishaps aside, the broader implications of these revelations suggest an exhausted Democratic base that may be seeking fresh leadership and new strategies as the traditional approaches continue to falter. The narrative that the Democratic Party is out of touch with the electorate becomes ever more potent in light of such clear evidence of failure in judgment and execution.
As Harris and her campaign team grapple with the fallout from these revelations, questions loom over their future viability.
The election cycle serves as a stark reminder for the left: successful campaigns depend not only on fundraising prowess but also on a clear understanding of the electorate’s pulse—a lesson that the GOP appears to have grasped with commendable clarity, leaving the Democrats with much to ponder as they attempt to regroup for the future.
Sources:
rumble.com
westernjournal.com
zerohedge.com
In a troubling admission that sends shockwaves through the Democratic camp, senior advisor David Plouffe has revealed that Kamala Harris’ internal polling never showed her ahead of Donald Trump, contrary to the myriad public polls suggesting otherwise.
This revelation, confirmed during a podcast appearance, indicates that the Harris campaign was living in a state of denial, having invested a staggering $1 billion while grossly overestimating its electoral standing.
Plouffe stated, “We didn’t get the breaks we needed on Election Day,” reinforcing a narrative of complacency and mismanagement that has unfortunately become a hallmark of recent Democratic campaigns.
Despite an overwhelming volume of cash spent on the campaign, including hefty contributions from various donors, it appears that internal panic consumed strategists long before Harris ever stepped on a debate stage. Plouffe's remarks expose a disconnect between the Harris campaign’s optimistic public messaging and the sobering realities captured in their internal assessments.
Moreover, this miscalculation is not an isolated incident. Pollster Ann Selzer, a veteran in the industry, was significantly off the mark, predicting a narrow win for Harris in Iowa only to see Trump prevail by an imposing 13-point margin. Such discrepancies raise serious questions about the competency of those tasked with guiding Democratic candidates through the electoral landscape.
As a result of this chaotic campaign run, the Republican Party capitalized on what has been one of their most successful election cycles since 2004. Trump's ability to rally support is reflected in the fact that he won the popular vote and decisively claimed every critical swing state.
Internal polling mishaps aside, the broader implications of these revelations suggest an exhausted Democratic base that may be seeking fresh leadership and new strategies as the traditional approaches continue to falter. The narrative that the Democratic Party is out of touch with the electorate becomes ever more potent in light of such clear evidence of failure in judgment and execution.
As Harris and her campaign team grapple with the fallout from these revelations, questions loom over their future viability.
The election cycle serves as a stark reminder for the left: successful campaigns depend not only on fundraising prowess but also on a clear understanding of the electorate’s pulse—a lesson that the GOP appears to have grasped with commendable clarity, leaving the Democrats with much to ponder as they attempt to regroup for the future.
Sources:
rumble.com
westernjournal.com
zerohedge.com
Latest News