Army Clears Pro-Life Groups of Terrorism Labeling
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 26 days ago
**Victory for Life: Pro-Life Organizations Cleared of Terrorism Label by Army**
In a significant victory for the pro-life movement, the U.S. Army has been forced to admit that prominent pro-life organizations, including Operation Rescue, are not domestic terrorist groups.
This acknowledgment came after a whistleblower revealed that the Army had misclassified these peaceful advocates during training sessions at Fort Liberty in North Carolina, using the term "terrorist group" to describe them on numerous occasions over the last seven years.
Operation Rescue, which has long advocated for the rights of the unborn, demanded accountability from the Army through legal channels after it became clear they were unjustly labeled as threats.
The organization's president, Troy Newman, highlighted the absurdity of the designation, stating, "If peaceful pro-life activism is now ‘terrorism,' what does that say about a society that allows Planned Parenthood to profit from selling the remains of aborted children?"
The uproar prompted U.S. Senator Ted Budd of North Carolina to confront Army Secretary Christine E. Wormuth, pressing her for a clear statement condemning the Army's history of mislabeling pro-life groups.
In her response, Wormuth attempted to clarify the situation, stating unequivocally that groups like National Right to Life are not terrorists and should not be described as such in military training documents.
However, this acknowledgment raised questions about why these violent characterizations were made in the first place, especially as they didn't even address Operation Rescue directly.
Facing the possibility of legal repercussions due to public backlash, the Army then issued a letter to Congress detailing their investigation into the training practices at Fort Liberty, confirming that the mislabeling had indeed occurred and would not happen again.
This decision is not just a win for Operation Rescue; it underscores the importance of safeguarding First Amendment rights and reaffirming that the Army's focus should remain on combating genuine threats rather than engaging in smear campaigns against those advocating for life.
As this situation unfolded, it became clear that the Army’s actions had broader implications. The targeting of pro-life groups reflects a troubling trend among some government entities to vilify those who stand firmly for conservative values, particularly those engaging in grassroots advocacy for the unborn.
Newman stated, "Operation Rescue did not and will not back down. No label, no smear, no lie will ever stop us from standing up for the unborn."
This incident serves as a reminder of the resilience of the pro-life community and their unwavering commitment to protect the most vulnerable members of society, regardless of the challenges they face.
Sources:
theepochtimes.com
lifenews.com
lifenews.com
In a significant victory for the pro-life movement, the U.S. Army has been forced to admit that prominent pro-life organizations, including Operation Rescue, are not domestic terrorist groups.
This acknowledgment came after a whistleblower revealed that the Army had misclassified these peaceful advocates during training sessions at Fort Liberty in North Carolina, using the term "terrorist group" to describe them on numerous occasions over the last seven years.
Operation Rescue, which has long advocated for the rights of the unborn, demanded accountability from the Army through legal channels after it became clear they were unjustly labeled as threats.
The organization's president, Troy Newman, highlighted the absurdity of the designation, stating, "If peaceful pro-life activism is now ‘terrorism,' what does that say about a society that allows Planned Parenthood to profit from selling the remains of aborted children?"
The uproar prompted U.S. Senator Ted Budd of North Carolina to confront Army Secretary Christine E. Wormuth, pressing her for a clear statement condemning the Army's history of mislabeling pro-life groups.
In her response, Wormuth attempted to clarify the situation, stating unequivocally that groups like National Right to Life are not terrorists and should not be described as such in military training documents.
However, this acknowledgment raised questions about why these violent characterizations were made in the first place, especially as they didn't even address Operation Rescue directly.
Facing the possibility of legal repercussions due to public backlash, the Army then issued a letter to Congress detailing their investigation into the training practices at Fort Liberty, confirming that the mislabeling had indeed occurred and would not happen again.
This decision is not just a win for Operation Rescue; it underscores the importance of safeguarding First Amendment rights and reaffirming that the Army's focus should remain on combating genuine threats rather than engaging in smear campaigns against those advocating for life.
As this situation unfolded, it became clear that the Army’s actions had broader implications. The targeting of pro-life groups reflects a troubling trend among some government entities to vilify those who stand firmly for conservative values, particularly those engaging in grassroots advocacy for the unborn.
Newman stated, "Operation Rescue did not and will not back down. No label, no smear, no lie will ever stop us from standing up for the unborn."
This incident serves as a reminder of the resilience of the pro-life community and their unwavering commitment to protect the most vulnerable members of society, regardless of the challenges they face.
Sources:
theepochtimes.com
lifenews.com
lifenews.com
Latest News