Medical Community Challenges Transgender Ideology's Impact on Children
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
The recent pushback against the pro-trans movement by prominent voices in the medical community marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate surrounding childhood gender dysphoria.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a respected cardiologist and former Vice Chief of Internal Medicine at the Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, has taken a courageous stance in his latest Substack post.
He brings attention to the alarming medical practices affecting children diagnosed with childhood gender dysphoria (CGD), a condition that affects a minuscule percentage of the population—reported to be less than 0.1%.
Dr. McCullough argues that a significant number of these cases, approximately 80%, resolve naturally during the course of normal puberty.
This perspective is supported by various studies indicating that many children who express feelings of gender dysphoria do not carry these identities into adulthood.
Yet, many American states have begun to ban transgender medical procedures for minors, citing serious concerns regarding the long-term health implications of such interventions.
The rise in support for these bans is indicative of a broader cultural awakening to the potential harm posed by irreversible medical procedures performed on children who may later determine that their feelings toward their gender were not permanent.
Dr. McCullough describes these operations as a “diabolical medical experiment,” raising ethical concerns regarding informed consent and the potential for long-lasting harm to vulnerable minors.
He emphasizes the importance of adopting a “do no harm” approach in pediatric healthcare, advocating for an immediate halt to transgender medical programs until thorough assessments can be made regarding their societal and individual impact on children who have transitioned.
Moreover, he draws attention to disturbing and potentially damaging instances in the judicial system, such as the case of Jeff Younger, a Texas father who has been embroiled in a heart-wrenching custody battle over his sons.
The father lost custody rights and has expressed fears for his children's well-being, especially after a California judge allowed irreversible procedures that he vehemently opposed.
This increasing trend of judicial systems siding with what many view as radical medical policies has prompted heightened scrutiny and backlash against the pro-trans lobby.
The discussions surrounding these issues are becoming increasingly relevant as they spill into the political arena, challenging the prevailing narratives pushed by the left.
Recent actions taken by corporations like Target suggest that the LGBTQ+ agenda may be losing some of its formerly untouchable status.
Target’s recent reversal on its previous stance regarding employee expression indicates a growing resistance to what many conservatives view as excessive or inappropriate promotion of gender ideology, particularly involving children.
Elements of a cultural shift appear to be taking shape, as public sentiment swings toward a more cautious approach regarding how gender identity issues are discussed and handled.
The marriage of political activism and medical practice is under increasing scrutiny, and doctors like McCullough are paving the way for a more responsible approach that prioritizes the health and well-being of children over ideological conformity.
As 2024 approaches, the narrative surrounding transgender issues will likely remain a hot button topic, and the push for rational discourse, rooted in science and ethical responsibility, will continue to resonate within conservative circles.
Sources:
rumble.com
dallasexpress.com
americanthinker.com
Dr. Peter McCullough, a respected cardiologist and former Vice Chief of Internal Medicine at the Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, has taken a courageous stance in his latest Substack post.
He brings attention to the alarming medical practices affecting children diagnosed with childhood gender dysphoria (CGD), a condition that affects a minuscule percentage of the population—reported to be less than 0.1%.
Dr. McCullough argues that a significant number of these cases, approximately 80%, resolve naturally during the course of normal puberty.
This perspective is supported by various studies indicating that many children who express feelings of gender dysphoria do not carry these identities into adulthood.
Yet, many American states have begun to ban transgender medical procedures for minors, citing serious concerns regarding the long-term health implications of such interventions.
The rise in support for these bans is indicative of a broader cultural awakening to the potential harm posed by irreversible medical procedures performed on children who may later determine that their feelings toward their gender were not permanent.
Dr. McCullough describes these operations as a “diabolical medical experiment,” raising ethical concerns regarding informed consent and the potential for long-lasting harm to vulnerable minors.
He emphasizes the importance of adopting a “do no harm” approach in pediatric healthcare, advocating for an immediate halt to transgender medical programs until thorough assessments can be made regarding their societal and individual impact on children who have transitioned.
Moreover, he draws attention to disturbing and potentially damaging instances in the judicial system, such as the case of Jeff Younger, a Texas father who has been embroiled in a heart-wrenching custody battle over his sons.
The father lost custody rights and has expressed fears for his children's well-being, especially after a California judge allowed irreversible procedures that he vehemently opposed.
This increasing trend of judicial systems siding with what many view as radical medical policies has prompted heightened scrutiny and backlash against the pro-trans lobby.
The discussions surrounding these issues are becoming increasingly relevant as they spill into the political arena, challenging the prevailing narratives pushed by the left.
Recent actions taken by corporations like Target suggest that the LGBTQ+ agenda may be losing some of its formerly untouchable status.
Target’s recent reversal on its previous stance regarding employee expression indicates a growing resistance to what many conservatives view as excessive or inappropriate promotion of gender ideology, particularly involving children.
Elements of a cultural shift appear to be taking shape, as public sentiment swings toward a more cautious approach regarding how gender identity issues are discussed and handled.
The marriage of political activism and medical practice is under increasing scrutiny, and doctors like McCullough are paving the way for a more responsible approach that prioritizes the health and well-being of children over ideological conformity.
As 2024 approaches, the narrative surrounding transgender issues will likely remain a hot button topic, and the push for rational discourse, rooted in science and ethical responsibility, will continue to resonate within conservative circles.
Sources:
rumble.com
dallasexpress.com
americanthinker.com
Latest News