California Teachers Fight Against Parental Rights, Tyranny Rises
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Descent into Tyranny: California Teachers Dismiss Parental Rights**
The recent spate of attacks on parental rights in California public schools signals a troubling trend toward government overreach in education.
In a disconcerting op-ed published in the Los Angeles Times’ Daily Pilot, teachers from the Newport-Mesa Unified School District openly mocked candidates advocating for parental rights.
These candidates, such as Philip Stemler and Amy Peters, are asserting that parents deserve a voice in their children's education, especially regarding vital issues like curriculum transparency and the handling of sensitive topics.
Their supporters argue that the push for transparency is a natural step in restoring the partnership between parents and educators. Yet, the teachers' union appears to view this drive as a threat, claiming that parents seeking greater involvement possess ulterior motives.
Matt Armstrong, an English teacher, framed the argument as a struggle against what he insinuates to be the oppressive nature of parental authority. He asserted that claims of parental rights are merely coded language meant to undermine the professionalism and autonomy of educators.
Such rhetoric raises eyebrows, particularly when considering California’s recent legislation like the SAFETY Act, which effectively mandates that school officials keep parents in the dark about their children's sexual orientation or gender identity.
According to critics, the law showcases a blatant disregard for parental rights in favor of a progressive agenda. The relationship between parents and schools is increasingly strained, with many educators seemingly convinced they know better than the child's own family.
Corey DeAngelis, a notable advocate for parental rights, condemned the teachers’ claims as "peak gaslighting." His sentiments are echoed throughout the state as other parental rights activists highlight their fundamental belief — that parents must be included in decisions affecting their children’s lives.
Furthermore, Alvin Lui, president of the parental rights group Courage Is a Habit, noted the school system’s disdain for these rights, labeling parents as "dangerous." This perspective reflects a growing divide between educators and families, signaling a need for reform.
Voters should take note: this conflict is not just about curriculums but the essence of family values in education. The battle for transparency and parental involvement is escalating, and citizens are increasingly encouraged to hold educators accountable at the ballot box.
As the debate intensifies, it raises questions about the future of education in California and whether the voices of parents will ultimately triumph over an increasingly authoritarian system.
Sources:
sonsoflibertymedia.com
newsbusters.org
theblaze.com
The recent spate of attacks on parental rights in California public schools signals a troubling trend toward government overreach in education.
In a disconcerting op-ed published in the Los Angeles Times’ Daily Pilot, teachers from the Newport-Mesa Unified School District openly mocked candidates advocating for parental rights.
These candidates, such as Philip Stemler and Amy Peters, are asserting that parents deserve a voice in their children's education, especially regarding vital issues like curriculum transparency and the handling of sensitive topics.
Their supporters argue that the push for transparency is a natural step in restoring the partnership between parents and educators. Yet, the teachers' union appears to view this drive as a threat, claiming that parents seeking greater involvement possess ulterior motives.
Matt Armstrong, an English teacher, framed the argument as a struggle against what he insinuates to be the oppressive nature of parental authority. He asserted that claims of parental rights are merely coded language meant to undermine the professionalism and autonomy of educators.
Such rhetoric raises eyebrows, particularly when considering California’s recent legislation like the SAFETY Act, which effectively mandates that school officials keep parents in the dark about their children's sexual orientation or gender identity.
According to critics, the law showcases a blatant disregard for parental rights in favor of a progressive agenda. The relationship between parents and schools is increasingly strained, with many educators seemingly convinced they know better than the child's own family.
Corey DeAngelis, a notable advocate for parental rights, condemned the teachers’ claims as "peak gaslighting." His sentiments are echoed throughout the state as other parental rights activists highlight their fundamental belief — that parents must be included in decisions affecting their children’s lives.
Furthermore, Alvin Lui, president of the parental rights group Courage Is a Habit, noted the school system’s disdain for these rights, labeling parents as "dangerous." This perspective reflects a growing divide between educators and families, signaling a need for reform.
Voters should take note: this conflict is not just about curriculums but the essence of family values in education. The battle for transparency and parental involvement is escalating, and citizens are increasingly encouraged to hold educators accountable at the ballot box.
As the debate intensifies, it raises questions about the future of education in California and whether the voices of parents will ultimately triumph over an increasingly authoritarian system.
Sources:
sonsoflibertymedia.com
newsbusters.org
theblaze.com
Latest News