Carbon Capture Debate: Protecting Property Rights Matters
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 4 hours ago
**Fraud Alert: Carbon Capture Under Fire as Property Rights Hang in the Balance**
A growing number of voices are raising concerns over the controversial practice of Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS), with critics calling it a dangerous deception that threatens individual property rights across the United States, particularly in Louisiana.
Recent commentary from Charles Owen, a member of the Louisiana Rural Caucus and a fierce advocate for property owners, exposes the unsettling reality of CCS initiatives. He describes them as a “fraud based on fake science,” suggesting that they may do more harm than good—undermining both the environment and citizens' rights to their land.
CCS is positioned by some politicians and environmental activists as a solution to climate change. However, Owen argues that this narrative is misleading and distracts from the true implications of injecting toxic substances underground. He emphasizes that the carbon captured from oil and gas extraction is essentially waste, which is being buried without adequate understanding of the potential long-term consequences.
The ongoing push for CCS has raised alarms among landowners who fear losing their rights to their property. Owen recounts alarming incidents where landowners were approached with proposals that resembled sales contracts, effectively preventing them from using their land as they see fit. He categorically rejects the idea that eminent domain should be employed to establish carbon storage sites.
With debates intensifying surrounding property rights and environmental impacts, Owen asserts that these discussions warrant a more honest evaluation of CCS technologies. It's clear that while many powerful advocates support this initiative, the argument that CCS is ultimately beneficial for the oil and gas sector is not as straightforward as it seems.
As OPEC's recent downgrades in oil demand growth forecasts and rising geopolitical tensions shake confidence in global markets, the environmental stakes are becoming more critical. The opposition to CCS, as highlighted by Owen, stands in stark contrast to the Biden administration's approach, which critics argue has led to billions of dollars in revenue funneled to adversarial regimes like Iran—all while American interests are sacrificed.
As voters head into the 2024 elections, the stance on CCS and its potential impacts on personal freedoms will undoubtedly shape the political landscape, urging many to grapple with the implications of policies on both local and national levels.
In light of this ongoing battle, concerned citizens are encouraged to inform themselves and engage in the dialogue, as the stakes for both economic vitality and environmental integrity hang in the balance.
The narrative surrounding carbon capture is far from settled, and as awareness grows, so too does the call for transparency and accountability from those promoting such initiatives. The future of our property rights could depend on it.
Sources:
theepochtimes.com
news.yahoo.com
thehayride.com
A growing number of voices are raising concerns over the controversial practice of Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS), with critics calling it a dangerous deception that threatens individual property rights across the United States, particularly in Louisiana.
Recent commentary from Charles Owen, a member of the Louisiana Rural Caucus and a fierce advocate for property owners, exposes the unsettling reality of CCS initiatives. He describes them as a “fraud based on fake science,” suggesting that they may do more harm than good—undermining both the environment and citizens' rights to their land.
CCS is positioned by some politicians and environmental activists as a solution to climate change. However, Owen argues that this narrative is misleading and distracts from the true implications of injecting toxic substances underground. He emphasizes that the carbon captured from oil and gas extraction is essentially waste, which is being buried without adequate understanding of the potential long-term consequences.
The ongoing push for CCS has raised alarms among landowners who fear losing their rights to their property. Owen recounts alarming incidents where landowners were approached with proposals that resembled sales contracts, effectively preventing them from using their land as they see fit. He categorically rejects the idea that eminent domain should be employed to establish carbon storage sites.
With debates intensifying surrounding property rights and environmental impacts, Owen asserts that these discussions warrant a more honest evaluation of CCS technologies. It's clear that while many powerful advocates support this initiative, the argument that CCS is ultimately beneficial for the oil and gas sector is not as straightforward as it seems.
As OPEC's recent downgrades in oil demand growth forecasts and rising geopolitical tensions shake confidence in global markets, the environmental stakes are becoming more critical. The opposition to CCS, as highlighted by Owen, stands in stark contrast to the Biden administration's approach, which critics argue has led to billions of dollars in revenue funneled to adversarial regimes like Iran—all while American interests are sacrificed.
As voters head into the 2024 elections, the stance on CCS and its potential impacts on personal freedoms will undoubtedly shape the political landscape, urging many to grapple with the implications of policies on both local and national levels.
In light of this ongoing battle, concerned citizens are encouraged to inform themselves and engage in the dialogue, as the stakes for both economic vitality and environmental integrity hang in the balance.
The narrative surrounding carbon capture is far from settled, and as awareness grows, so too does the call for transparency and accountability from those promoting such initiatives. The future of our property rights could depend on it.
Sources:
theepochtimes.com
news.yahoo.com
thehayride.com
Latest News