Leading Scientist Declares Climate Alarmism is Propaganda
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Climate Alarmism Exposed as Propaganda by Leading Scientist**
In a bold statement that challenges the increasingly popular narrative on climate change, renowned MIT scientist Richard Lindzen has labeled the mainstream "global warming" agenda as a façade orchestrated by power-hungry globalists.
Speaking in Brussels at a forum hosted by the Hungarian think tank MCC, Lindzen, who has extensively studied atmospheric sciences, emphasized that what is often branded as “settled science” surrounding climate change is more a product of political agendas than genuine scientific consensus.
Lindzen's insights echoed a growing sentiment among many who question the alarming claims pushed by climate alarmists.
His examination of the climate crisis suggests a long history of political movements manipulating scientific data to advance their aims.
According to Lindzen, the modern obsession with climate change reflects an elite narrative that sidesteps factual discussions and instead relies on fearmongering tactics to achieve political control.
He argued that these strategies date back decades, with various movements utilizing the guise of scientific endorsement to rally support against perceived enemies.
This recent surge in climate activism, Lindzen asserts, is less about genuine concern for the planet and more about advancing an expansive regulatory agenda that threatens economic stability.
He pointed to the United Nations’ recent demand for an additional $308 billion per year from wealthy nations to combat climate change in developing countries as clear evidence of this “globalist” mentality.
Critics of the UN claim that such financial demands do little to help actual communities and instead enrich corrupt bureaucracies.
Lindzen's speech serves as a critical counter-narrative to the “climate change is an existential threat” rhetoric propagated by political leaders and activists.
As Lindzen urges for a more nuanced and scientifically rigorous dialogue surrounding climate issues, it’s clear that there is a significant divide in how experts and politicians frame the reality of climate science.
This dissection of the climate agenda encourages the American public to question the motives behind the climate narrative and to consider the very real economic implications of the proposed policies.
As conservatives increasingly rally against overreaching environmental regulations, Lindzen's insights may offer a fresh perspective in addressing this critical issue, urging a move away from alarmism towards constructive debate.
Sources:
slaynews.com
slaynews.com
thepostmillennial.com
In a bold statement that challenges the increasingly popular narrative on climate change, renowned MIT scientist Richard Lindzen has labeled the mainstream "global warming" agenda as a façade orchestrated by power-hungry globalists.
Speaking in Brussels at a forum hosted by the Hungarian think tank MCC, Lindzen, who has extensively studied atmospheric sciences, emphasized that what is often branded as “settled science” surrounding climate change is more a product of political agendas than genuine scientific consensus.
Lindzen's insights echoed a growing sentiment among many who question the alarming claims pushed by climate alarmists.
His examination of the climate crisis suggests a long history of political movements manipulating scientific data to advance their aims.
According to Lindzen, the modern obsession with climate change reflects an elite narrative that sidesteps factual discussions and instead relies on fearmongering tactics to achieve political control.
He argued that these strategies date back decades, with various movements utilizing the guise of scientific endorsement to rally support against perceived enemies.
This recent surge in climate activism, Lindzen asserts, is less about genuine concern for the planet and more about advancing an expansive regulatory agenda that threatens economic stability.
He pointed to the United Nations’ recent demand for an additional $308 billion per year from wealthy nations to combat climate change in developing countries as clear evidence of this “globalist” mentality.
Critics of the UN claim that such financial demands do little to help actual communities and instead enrich corrupt bureaucracies.
Lindzen's speech serves as a critical counter-narrative to the “climate change is an existential threat” rhetoric propagated by political leaders and activists.
As Lindzen urges for a more nuanced and scientifically rigorous dialogue surrounding climate issues, it’s clear that there is a significant divide in how experts and politicians frame the reality of climate science.
This dissection of the climate agenda encourages the American public to question the motives behind the climate narrative and to consider the very real economic implications of the proposed policies.
As conservatives increasingly rally against overreaching environmental regulations, Lindzen's insights may offer a fresh perspective in addressing this critical issue, urging a move away from alarmism towards constructive debate.
Sources:
slaynews.com
slaynews.com
thepostmillennial.com
Latest News