New Study Raises Concerns Over COVID Vaccines for Kids
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
Vaccination Safety Concerns Continue to Mount as New Study Reveals Risks for Children
A groundbreaking study involving over 1.7 million children and teens has sparked renewed debate about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines for younger populations.
Conducted by a team of researchers from prestigious institutions, including Oxford and Harvard, the study focuses on the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and its implications for children aged 5 to 15.
Findings indicate that the vaccine offers minimal protection against COVID-19, averaging just 14 to 15 weeks, while also increasing the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly among vaccinated adolescents.
Dr. Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense, emphasized that this data raises critical questions regarding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) continued endorsement of these vaccines for children.
"Why does the CDC persist in recommending these unlicensed shots for kids?" Hooker asked. “Where is the data supporting the assertion that the benefits of these vaccines outweigh the risks?”
Despite the push for widespread vaccination among children, the study found no COVID-19 deaths among the cohort, further challenging the narrative that vaccination is essential for protecting this age group.
Results from the observational study reveal that the risks of hospitalization due to COVID-19 are exceedingly rare for both vaccinated and unvaccinated children, further questioning the necessity of vaccination in this demographic.
Of particular concern, cases of myocarditis and pericarditis were exclusively noted among vaccinated individuals, prompting calls for a reevaluation of public health policies involving childhood vaccinations.
As the debate around vaccine safety intensifies, more parents are likely to question the motives behind federal health guidelines and the transparency of the data used to inform these critical decisions.
This latest study underscores the need for comprehensive public discourse on the implications of COVID-19 vaccinations and the regulatory frameworks guiding them, as families seek clarity amidst ongoing health uncertainties.
Sources:
rumble.com
childrenshealthdefense.org
A groundbreaking study involving over 1.7 million children and teens has sparked renewed debate about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines for younger populations.
Conducted by a team of researchers from prestigious institutions, including Oxford and Harvard, the study focuses on the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and its implications for children aged 5 to 15.
Findings indicate that the vaccine offers minimal protection against COVID-19, averaging just 14 to 15 weeks, while also increasing the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly among vaccinated adolescents.
Dr. Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense, emphasized that this data raises critical questions regarding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) continued endorsement of these vaccines for children.
"Why does the CDC persist in recommending these unlicensed shots for kids?" Hooker asked. “Where is the data supporting the assertion that the benefits of these vaccines outweigh the risks?”
Despite the push for widespread vaccination among children, the study found no COVID-19 deaths among the cohort, further challenging the narrative that vaccination is essential for protecting this age group.
Results from the observational study reveal that the risks of hospitalization due to COVID-19 are exceedingly rare for both vaccinated and unvaccinated children, further questioning the necessity of vaccination in this demographic.
Of particular concern, cases of myocarditis and pericarditis were exclusively noted among vaccinated individuals, prompting calls for a reevaluation of public health policies involving childhood vaccinations.
As the debate around vaccine safety intensifies, more parents are likely to question the motives behind federal health guidelines and the transparency of the data used to inform these critical decisions.
This latest study underscores the need for comprehensive public discourse on the implications of COVID-19 vaccinations and the regulatory frameworks guiding them, as families seek clarity amidst ongoing health uncertainties.
Sources:
rumble.com
childrenshealthdefense.org
Latest News