Walz's Infanticide Policy Exposed: A Presidential Debate Shocker
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Infanticide Revelations: The Shocking Truth Behind Walz's Policies**
In a chilling revelation during the recent CBS vice presidential debate, Republican JD Vance confronted his opponent, Democrat Tim Walz, over a deeply disturbing aspect of his governance in Minnesota.
Vance accused Walz of supporting infanticide, specifically citing his signing of legislation that dismantled protections for infants who survive failed abortions.
This shocking claim stems from Walz's repeal of the "Born Alive Infants Protection Act."
Before this repeal, doctors were obliged to provide life-saving care to infants born alive after an abortion attempt.
Now, under the new law, doctors face no such obligation.
Statistics from Minnesota highlight the grim reality of this policy.
Records show that between 2019 and 2021, several infants survived botched abortions but were left to die without any medical intervention.
In fact, under Walz's tenure, eight such infants were denied care, raising moral and ethical concerns about the implications of his pro-abortion agenda.
Vance articulated the gravity of this situation during the debate by referring to the Minnesota statute that Walz signed into law.
He poignantly questioned Walz, “Do you want to force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions against their will?”
This challenge underscores a significant concern among voters: the alarming trend in which certain lawmakers seek to undermine the rights and conscience of medical professionals in the name of radical pro-abortion policies.
Vance's comments hold particular resonance in light of the ongoing national conversation surrounding the sanctity of life, highlighting the stark contrast between Republican values and extreme Democratic policies.
As the 2024 election approaches, the stakes have never been higher for pro-life supporters who view these legislative decisions as unacceptable.
Voters are increasingly motivated to hold accountable those who enable such troubling practices, emphasizing the urgency for a more compassionate approach to abortion and healthcare.
Thus, as Americans evaluate the candidates, it's vital to consider the implications of electing leaders who prioritize ideology over the welfare of innocent lives.
Sources:
justthenews.com
pjmedia.com
breitbart.com
In a chilling revelation during the recent CBS vice presidential debate, Republican JD Vance confronted his opponent, Democrat Tim Walz, over a deeply disturbing aspect of his governance in Minnesota.
Vance accused Walz of supporting infanticide, specifically citing his signing of legislation that dismantled protections for infants who survive failed abortions.
This shocking claim stems from Walz's repeal of the "Born Alive Infants Protection Act."
Before this repeal, doctors were obliged to provide life-saving care to infants born alive after an abortion attempt.
Now, under the new law, doctors face no such obligation.
Statistics from Minnesota highlight the grim reality of this policy.
Records show that between 2019 and 2021, several infants survived botched abortions but were left to die without any medical intervention.
In fact, under Walz's tenure, eight such infants were denied care, raising moral and ethical concerns about the implications of his pro-abortion agenda.
Vance articulated the gravity of this situation during the debate by referring to the Minnesota statute that Walz signed into law.
He poignantly questioned Walz, “Do you want to force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions against their will?”
This challenge underscores a significant concern among voters: the alarming trend in which certain lawmakers seek to undermine the rights and conscience of medical professionals in the name of radical pro-abortion policies.
Vance's comments hold particular resonance in light of the ongoing national conversation surrounding the sanctity of life, highlighting the stark contrast between Republican values and extreme Democratic policies.
As the 2024 election approaches, the stakes have never been higher for pro-life supporters who view these legislative decisions as unacceptable.
Voters are increasingly motivated to hold accountable those who enable such troubling practices, emphasizing the urgency for a more compassionate approach to abortion and healthcare.
Thus, as Americans evaluate the candidates, it's vital to consider the implications of electing leaders who prioritize ideology over the welfare of innocent lives.
Sources:
justthenews.com
pjmedia.com
breitbart.com
Latest News