Supreme Court Must Protect Election Integrity In Illinois
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Integrity**
The ongoing battle for election integrity continues to capture the national conversation, particularly as the Supreme Court is being called upon to review crucial decisions regarding mail-in ballots in Illinois.
Judicial Watch, a non-profit organization known for its emphasis on government accountability, is spearheading this legal push. The group is challenging Illinois' law, which permits mail-in ballots to be counted for a full 14 days after Election Day. This controversial practice invites questions about the legitimacy of the electoral process.
Roy Horras, an official with an Illinois election integrity advocacy group, underscored the implications of the law, particularly about its potential to foster voter fraud.
The U.S. Supreme Court is now being urged to step in after a previous ruling by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that U.S. Representative Mike Bost, a Republican from Murphysboro, lacked standing to argue against the provision.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton criticized the Illinois law, asserting that it undermines federal election standards.
Fitton has been vocal about how counting ballots after Election Day disrupts the electoral timeline, creating fertile ground for a lack of confidence among voters regarding the integrity of elections. He firmly stated, "Counting ballots after Election Day is a great way to invite fraud and it undermines confidence in elections and it's downright illegal."
What's particularly noteworthy is the dissonance between different jurisdictions. Particularly, the Fifth Circuit Court recently ruled against a similar practice in Mississippi, reinforcing the perception that laws regarding mail-in voting can vary significantly and lead to confusion.
The magnitude of this situation was echoed by Horras, who suggested that the existence of conflicting rulings could increase the likelihood of the Supreme Court hearing the Illinois case.
As the nation prepares for upcoming elections, ensuring the integrity of the electoral process remains paramount. It is essential that voters feel confident in the second half of the democratic system—the counting of their votes—without apprehension that the rules can easily be manipulated.
Judicial Watch's actions highlight the ongoing efforts by conservatives to safeguard election integrity and ensure transparency in the voting process. In a political climate fraught with divisions, addressing these crucial issues is more important than ever.
Sources:
economiccollapse.report
justthenews.com
cnn.com
The ongoing battle for election integrity continues to capture the national conversation, particularly as the Supreme Court is being called upon to review crucial decisions regarding mail-in ballots in Illinois.
Judicial Watch, a non-profit organization known for its emphasis on government accountability, is spearheading this legal push. The group is challenging Illinois' law, which permits mail-in ballots to be counted for a full 14 days after Election Day. This controversial practice invites questions about the legitimacy of the electoral process.
Roy Horras, an official with an Illinois election integrity advocacy group, underscored the implications of the law, particularly about its potential to foster voter fraud.
The U.S. Supreme Court is now being urged to step in after a previous ruling by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that U.S. Representative Mike Bost, a Republican from Murphysboro, lacked standing to argue against the provision.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton criticized the Illinois law, asserting that it undermines federal election standards.
Fitton has been vocal about how counting ballots after Election Day disrupts the electoral timeline, creating fertile ground for a lack of confidence among voters regarding the integrity of elections. He firmly stated, "Counting ballots after Election Day is a great way to invite fraud and it undermines confidence in elections and it's downright illegal."
What's particularly noteworthy is the dissonance between different jurisdictions. Particularly, the Fifth Circuit Court recently ruled against a similar practice in Mississippi, reinforcing the perception that laws regarding mail-in voting can vary significantly and lead to confusion.
The magnitude of this situation was echoed by Horras, who suggested that the existence of conflicting rulings could increase the likelihood of the Supreme Court hearing the Illinois case.
As the nation prepares for upcoming elections, ensuring the integrity of the electoral process remains paramount. It is essential that voters feel confident in the second half of the democratic system—the counting of their votes—without apprehension that the rules can easily be manipulated.
Judicial Watch's actions highlight the ongoing efforts by conservatives to safeguard election integrity and ensure transparency in the voting process. In a political climate fraught with divisions, addressing these crucial issues is more important than ever.
Sources:
economiccollapse.report
justthenews.com
cnn.com
Latest News