Arizona AG's Stunning Admission Undermines 2020 Election Integrity
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Shocking Revelation: Arizona’s Attorney General Admits 2020 Election Was "Challengeable"**
In a stunning turn of events, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has inadvertently exonerated 18 defendants—many tied to former President Donald Trump—by admitting that the state’s last two elections were "challengeable." This revelation came to light during a private phone conversation that was leaked, where Mayes discussed the ongoing case against these individuals, who had been indicted for questioning the integrity of the 2020 election.
The defendants include prominent figures such as Trump’s former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and well-known attorney Rudy Giuliani. They were charged with conspiracy and related offenses for presenting an alternative slate of electors following what many claim was a flawed election process.
Interestingly, the validity of these charges is now under scrutiny. In her phone call, Mayes acknowledged issues regarding the verification of voter citizenship in Arizona, a problem dating back over 20 years. This lack of verification has led to widespread doubts about the legitimacy of many ballots cast in past elections.
“After two decades, it has become evident that the previous elections—and the recent ones—are indeed challengeable,” Mayes stated, effectively undermining her own prosecution strategy against the defendants. This was echoed by Republican former Arizona Attorney General nominee Abe Hamadeh, who remarked, “This admission signals a critical turning point; it’s time she drops her politically motivated case against those who simply questioned the integrity of our elections.”
Further complicating the situation, Mayes' political bias has come under the spotlight. Just weeks before filing these charges, she was recorded saying, “We absolutely have to get President Biden reelected,” casting doubt on her motivations in prosecuting Trump allies. Critics argue that the indictment is a clear attempt to stifle dissenting voices and protect a narrative that many believe is fundamentally flawed.
As the case unfolds, it raises critical questions about election integrity in Arizona and highlights the ongoing struggle between conservative and liberal factions regarding the validity of the 2020 election. The fallout from this revelation may have lasting implications not only for the defendants involved but for future electoral processes across the country.
With political tensions on the rise and scrutiny of election integrity more pronounced than ever, one thing is clear: this contentious saga is far from over. The challenges to Arizona's electoral system and the pursuit of justice for those seeking accountability continue to be of paramount concern.
Stay tuned as this crucial story unfolds, with potential implications for the upcoming elections and the broader narrative of American democracy.
Sources:
theblogginghounds.com
rumble.com
zerohedge.com
In a stunning turn of events, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has inadvertently exonerated 18 defendants—many tied to former President Donald Trump—by admitting that the state’s last two elections were "challengeable." This revelation came to light during a private phone conversation that was leaked, where Mayes discussed the ongoing case against these individuals, who had been indicted for questioning the integrity of the 2020 election.
The defendants include prominent figures such as Trump’s former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and well-known attorney Rudy Giuliani. They were charged with conspiracy and related offenses for presenting an alternative slate of electors following what many claim was a flawed election process.
Interestingly, the validity of these charges is now under scrutiny. In her phone call, Mayes acknowledged issues regarding the verification of voter citizenship in Arizona, a problem dating back over 20 years. This lack of verification has led to widespread doubts about the legitimacy of many ballots cast in past elections.
“After two decades, it has become evident that the previous elections—and the recent ones—are indeed challengeable,” Mayes stated, effectively undermining her own prosecution strategy against the defendants. This was echoed by Republican former Arizona Attorney General nominee Abe Hamadeh, who remarked, “This admission signals a critical turning point; it’s time she drops her politically motivated case against those who simply questioned the integrity of our elections.”
Further complicating the situation, Mayes' political bias has come under the spotlight. Just weeks before filing these charges, she was recorded saying, “We absolutely have to get President Biden reelected,” casting doubt on her motivations in prosecuting Trump allies. Critics argue that the indictment is a clear attempt to stifle dissenting voices and protect a narrative that many believe is fundamentally flawed.
As the case unfolds, it raises critical questions about election integrity in Arizona and highlights the ongoing struggle between conservative and liberal factions regarding the validity of the 2020 election. The fallout from this revelation may have lasting implications not only for the defendants involved but for future electoral processes across the country.
With political tensions on the rise and scrutiny of election integrity more pronounced than ever, one thing is clear: this contentious saga is far from over. The challenges to Arizona's electoral system and the pursuit of justice for those seeking accountability continue to be of paramount concern.
Stay tuned as this crucial story unfolds, with potential implications for the upcoming elections and the broader narrative of American democracy.
Sources:
theblogginghounds.com
rumble.com
zerohedge.com
Latest News