UN Pact Undermines American Sovereignty and Freedom
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Globalist Agenda: UN's New Pact Threatens American Sovereignty**
In a controversial move that has drawn sharp criticism from numerous American lawmakers, the United Nations has adopted a new agreement known as the "Pact for the Future." This pact, which many perceive as a step towards increasing global governance, has raised alarms over potential infringements on U.S. sovereignty and the influence of authoritarian regimes like the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
At the recent Summit for the Future, held during the U.N. General Assembly, this new agreement was adopted by consensus, highlighting a growing trend of prioritizing international institutions over nation-states. The ambitious pact includes provisions aimed at redefining global governance, ostensibly to address contemporary issues like climate change, technology, and public health.
Representative Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) voiced his concerns during a press conference on Capitol Hill, emphasizing the need to maintain U.S. autonomy in the face of growing global pressures. "We can’t give up any more of our sovereignty, any more of our geopolitical integrity, or any more of our economic integrity to foreign actors who have no concerns for the United States of America," he stated firmly.
Rep. Mike McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, echoed these sentiments. He cautioned that the pact ignores the significant threat posed by the CCP within the U.N. system, stating, "This 66-page pact is limitless in scope" and neglects to tackle the pressing issues concerning global governance today.
The pact's provisions include a Global Digital Compact that aims to combat “misinformation” and “disinformation.” Critics argue that such measures risk censoring free speech and stifling dissent. Reggie Littlejohn, president of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, warned that attempts to control the narrative surrounding global issues could lead to a "totalitarian" environment where free expression is compromised.
The sweeping ambitions of the United Nations, as evidenced by the adoption of this pact, pose a profound threat to American principles of sovereignty and individual freedoms. Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations Kevin Moley remarked, “Allowing the U.N. to deal with this is the equivalent of putting the CCP in charge of global emergencies.”
Globally, some nations like Argentina are already distancing themselves from the U.N., asserting their right to independent governance. As highlighted by Argentina's Foreign Minister, the ability to make decisions without external pressures is crucial for true national development.
The implications of the "Pact for the Future" extend beyond mere policy-making; they represent a profound shift towards a system where international dictates could override national interests. For many, this is not just a matter of diplomacy but a critical juncture in defending the very fabric of democratic governance in America and around the world.
As we observe the developments stemming from this new U.N. initiative, it becomes increasingly important for Americans to stay informed and engaged regarding their national sovereignty and the growing influence of global institutions.
Sources:
thenewamerican.com
naturalnews.com
theepochtimes.com
In a controversial move that has drawn sharp criticism from numerous American lawmakers, the United Nations has adopted a new agreement known as the "Pact for the Future." This pact, which many perceive as a step towards increasing global governance, has raised alarms over potential infringements on U.S. sovereignty and the influence of authoritarian regimes like the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
At the recent Summit for the Future, held during the U.N. General Assembly, this new agreement was adopted by consensus, highlighting a growing trend of prioritizing international institutions over nation-states. The ambitious pact includes provisions aimed at redefining global governance, ostensibly to address contemporary issues like climate change, technology, and public health.
Representative Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) voiced his concerns during a press conference on Capitol Hill, emphasizing the need to maintain U.S. autonomy in the face of growing global pressures. "We can’t give up any more of our sovereignty, any more of our geopolitical integrity, or any more of our economic integrity to foreign actors who have no concerns for the United States of America," he stated firmly.
Rep. Mike McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, echoed these sentiments. He cautioned that the pact ignores the significant threat posed by the CCP within the U.N. system, stating, "This 66-page pact is limitless in scope" and neglects to tackle the pressing issues concerning global governance today.
The pact's provisions include a Global Digital Compact that aims to combat “misinformation” and “disinformation.” Critics argue that such measures risk censoring free speech and stifling dissent. Reggie Littlejohn, president of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, warned that attempts to control the narrative surrounding global issues could lead to a "totalitarian" environment where free expression is compromised.
The sweeping ambitions of the United Nations, as evidenced by the adoption of this pact, pose a profound threat to American principles of sovereignty and individual freedoms. Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations Kevin Moley remarked, “Allowing the U.N. to deal with this is the equivalent of putting the CCP in charge of global emergencies.”
Globally, some nations like Argentina are already distancing themselves from the U.N., asserting their right to independent governance. As highlighted by Argentina's Foreign Minister, the ability to make decisions without external pressures is crucial for true national development.
The implications of the "Pact for the Future" extend beyond mere policy-making; they represent a profound shift towards a system where international dictates could override national interests. For many, this is not just a matter of diplomacy but a critical juncture in defending the very fabric of democratic governance in America and around the world.
As we observe the developments stemming from this new U.N. initiative, it becomes increasingly important for Americans to stay informed and engaged regarding their national sovereignty and the growing influence of global institutions.
Sources:
thenewamerican.com
naturalnews.com
theepochtimes.com
Latest News