Harris's Economic Endorsements: A Study in Hypocrisy
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Hypocrisy**
In a stunning display of political double standards, Vice President Kamala Harris has garnered the endorsement of over 400 economists, even as her economic track record raises significant concerns about her ability to lead responsibly.
This endorsement, filled with praise for Harris's supposed economic acumen, is baffling when compared to the reality of her tenure under the Biden-Harris administration.
During their time in office, this administration has added a staggering $6.3 trillion to the national debt, pushing the total public debt to nearly $35 trillion.
Currently, interest payments on this debt surpass government spending on vital areas such as national defense and education, placing an immense burden on future generations.
Despite these alarming figures, Harris claims to have worked on behalf of American families, highlighting her commitment to cutting costs and increasing wages.
However, the rising inflation rate—between 15% and 20% since February 2021—has hit middle-class families hard, leading to skyrocketing prices in everyday essentials.
Faced with this financial turmoil, many believe the Biden-Harris administration’s economic policies have only exacerbated the situation.
Notably, while critics frequently point to President Donald Trump’s last months in office as a catalyst for current economic woes, data shows that inflation was minimal then, hovering around 1.4% — a stark contrast to today's rampant surge.
Moreover, Harris's claims of job creation are under scrutiny as many of the jobs reported since 2021 are merely recoveries from pandemic losses rather than true new growth.
This has led to skepticism about her proposed economic measures, including a $25,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers which, critics argue, would further fuel housing inflation rather than make homes more affordable.
Additionally, her idea of implementing price controls to combat inflation has historical precedents that suggest such strategies are flawed.
Countries like Argentina have faced dire consequences after imposing similar controls, leading to severe shortages and rampant inflation.
Despite this, Harris remains popular among a faction of economists who seem willing to overlook her administration's failures in hopes of achieving ideological goals.
The disconnect between these endorsements and the lived realities of ordinary Americans raises crucial questions for voters as we approach the upcoming election.
The stakes have never been higher, and it appears that the economic policies advocated by Democrats could lead to further turmoil and hardship for the American people.
As voters look toward November, understanding the implications of these endorsements and the economic philosophies behind them will be key in making informed choices.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
thefederalist.com
thepostmillennial.com
In a stunning display of political double standards, Vice President Kamala Harris has garnered the endorsement of over 400 economists, even as her economic track record raises significant concerns about her ability to lead responsibly.
This endorsement, filled with praise for Harris's supposed economic acumen, is baffling when compared to the reality of her tenure under the Biden-Harris administration.
During their time in office, this administration has added a staggering $6.3 trillion to the national debt, pushing the total public debt to nearly $35 trillion.
Currently, interest payments on this debt surpass government spending on vital areas such as national defense and education, placing an immense burden on future generations.
Despite these alarming figures, Harris claims to have worked on behalf of American families, highlighting her commitment to cutting costs and increasing wages.
However, the rising inflation rate—between 15% and 20% since February 2021—has hit middle-class families hard, leading to skyrocketing prices in everyday essentials.
Faced with this financial turmoil, many believe the Biden-Harris administration’s economic policies have only exacerbated the situation.
Notably, while critics frequently point to President Donald Trump’s last months in office as a catalyst for current economic woes, data shows that inflation was minimal then, hovering around 1.4% — a stark contrast to today's rampant surge.
Moreover, Harris's claims of job creation are under scrutiny as many of the jobs reported since 2021 are merely recoveries from pandemic losses rather than true new growth.
This has led to skepticism about her proposed economic measures, including a $25,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers which, critics argue, would further fuel housing inflation rather than make homes more affordable.
Additionally, her idea of implementing price controls to combat inflation has historical precedents that suggest such strategies are flawed.
Countries like Argentina have faced dire consequences after imposing similar controls, leading to severe shortages and rampant inflation.
Despite this, Harris remains popular among a faction of economists who seem willing to overlook her administration's failures in hopes of achieving ideological goals.
The disconnect between these endorsements and the lived realities of ordinary Americans raises crucial questions for voters as we approach the upcoming election.
The stakes have never been higher, and it appears that the economic policies advocated by Democrats could lead to further turmoil and hardship for the American people.
As voters look toward November, understanding the implications of these endorsements and the economic philosophies behind them will be key in making informed choices.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
thefederalist.com
thepostmillennial.com
Latest News