Biden DOJ Protects UN Employees Linked to Terrorism
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
The Biden-Harris administration is once again raising concerns with its latest legal maneuver involving the Department of Justice (DOJ), which is defending United Nations employees linked to the brutal October 7th Hamas terror attacks.
In a shocking development, the DOJ filed an amicus brief supporting the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), asserting that its employees involved in the attacks should be immune from lawsuits. This defense echoes UNRWA's claims of immunity predicated on a 1946 agreement that appears woefully outdated in the face of contemporary threats against American allies.
UNRWA has admitted that nine of its employees may have had direct ties to the violence, with one even transporting a murdered Israeli back to Gaza. Yet the DOJ's position insists that the employees should remain untouchable, which many see as an alarming abdication of responsibility in a time when accountability is paramount.
Critics, including legal experts and voices within the Jewish community, have decried this stance. They argue that when terrorism is involved, international organizations do not enjoy absolute immunity. This echoes the sentiments expressed in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, which allows for exceptions in cases of serious wrongdoing.
The stark contrast between this administration's approach and that of former President Trump is palpable. In 2018, Trump cut off funding to UNRWA, citing its troubling connections to Hamas. Conversely, President Biden not only restored funding upon taking office but also backtracked on accountability measures that could prevent future terrorism.
This case illustrates the broader implications of the Biden administration's relationships with international governance bodies, especially as it pertains to terrorist affiliations and the safeguarding of American interests. In the eyes of many, it sends a troubling message that certain entities can evade responsibility for their actions, particularly when those actions threaten lives.
As the case unfolds in federal court, it adds another chapter to the ongoing debate about the U.S.'s role in holding international organizations accountable for their complicity in terror activities. In a world increasingly defined by threats and challenges, there is a growing call for a strong, principled stance that prioritizes American values and supports allies in distress.
The question remains: will the Biden-Harris administration take the necessary steps to protect the interests of the United States and its allies, or will it continue down a path of complacency and concessions that emboldens terror?
Sources:
rvmnews.com
thedupreereport.com
reclaimthenet.org
In a shocking development, the DOJ filed an amicus brief supporting the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), asserting that its employees involved in the attacks should be immune from lawsuits. This defense echoes UNRWA's claims of immunity predicated on a 1946 agreement that appears woefully outdated in the face of contemporary threats against American allies.
UNRWA has admitted that nine of its employees may have had direct ties to the violence, with one even transporting a murdered Israeli back to Gaza. Yet the DOJ's position insists that the employees should remain untouchable, which many see as an alarming abdication of responsibility in a time when accountability is paramount.
Critics, including legal experts and voices within the Jewish community, have decried this stance. They argue that when terrorism is involved, international organizations do not enjoy absolute immunity. This echoes the sentiments expressed in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, which allows for exceptions in cases of serious wrongdoing.
The stark contrast between this administration's approach and that of former President Trump is palpable. In 2018, Trump cut off funding to UNRWA, citing its troubling connections to Hamas. Conversely, President Biden not only restored funding upon taking office but also backtracked on accountability measures that could prevent future terrorism.
This case illustrates the broader implications of the Biden administration's relationships with international governance bodies, especially as it pertains to terrorist affiliations and the safeguarding of American interests. In the eyes of many, it sends a troubling message that certain entities can evade responsibility for their actions, particularly when those actions threaten lives.
As the case unfolds in federal court, it adds another chapter to the ongoing debate about the U.S.'s role in holding international organizations accountable for their complicity in terror activities. In a world increasingly defined by threats and challenges, there is a growing call for a strong, principled stance that prioritizes American values and supports allies in distress.
The question remains: will the Biden-Harris administration take the necessary steps to protect the interests of the United States and its allies, or will it continue down a path of complacency and concessions that emboldens terror?
Sources:
rvmnews.com
thedupreereport.com
reclaimthenet.org
Latest News