Kamala Harris' Filibuster Plan Threatens Democracy and Moderates
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Crippling Democracy: Kamala Harris' Filibuster Proposal Raises Alarm Among Moderates**
In a surprising turn of events, Senator Joe Manchin has made headlines by refusing to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris following her threat to eliminate the Senate filibuster.
This bold declaration by Harris underscores a growing trend among Democrats who are willing to undermine democratic processes to advance their agendas.
During an interview with Wisconsin Public Radio, Harris stated her intent to “nuke” the filibuster in order to codify Roe v. Wade into law.
This radical proposal is not just alarming for conservatives; it's igniting concern among moderates as well.
Manchin, a key figure who left the Democratic Party earlier this year due to what he described as "partisan extremism," sharply criticized Harris, saying, “Shame on her.”
He emphasized that the filibuster is crucial for democracy, serving as a mechanism that fosters bipartisan dialogue and collaboration.
“The filibuster keeps us talking and working together. If she gets rid of that, then this would be the House on steroids,” Manchin asserted, highlighting the chaotic implications of stripping away such an essential tool for governance.
Moreover, Manchin's refusal to back Harris signals a significant rift within the Democratic Party.
This internal conflict showcases that even within the party, there are growing concerns about the potential consequences of eliminating the filibuster, especially when it comes to abortion legislation.
Implementing such a drastic rule change could lead to unforeseen repercussions if Republicans regain control of Congress, allowing them to implement their own legislative priorities swiftly.
Many are now left questioning how Democrat strategies, particularly proposals from the left, will impact future governance.
The risk of setting a precedent that could lead to divisive and unilateral decision-making is a live concern among not just conservatives but moderate Democrats as well.
As this critical situation unfolds, the GOP and its supporters are positioned to capitalize on the left's contentious push, as the implications of Harris' plans could resonate through the 2024 Election cycle and beyond.
In a system designed to encourage dialogue and compromise, the potential elimination of the filibuster serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of democracy when ideological extremism takes the helm.
As these plans develop, Americans should brace for the broader ramifications of such politically charged decisions, especially as the new election season approaches.
Sources:
twitchy.com
cc.bingj.comhttps%3a%2f%2fwa
aol.com
In a surprising turn of events, Senator Joe Manchin has made headlines by refusing to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris following her threat to eliminate the Senate filibuster.
This bold declaration by Harris underscores a growing trend among Democrats who are willing to undermine democratic processes to advance their agendas.
During an interview with Wisconsin Public Radio, Harris stated her intent to “nuke” the filibuster in order to codify Roe v. Wade into law.
This radical proposal is not just alarming for conservatives; it's igniting concern among moderates as well.
Manchin, a key figure who left the Democratic Party earlier this year due to what he described as "partisan extremism," sharply criticized Harris, saying, “Shame on her.”
He emphasized that the filibuster is crucial for democracy, serving as a mechanism that fosters bipartisan dialogue and collaboration.
“The filibuster keeps us talking and working together. If she gets rid of that, then this would be the House on steroids,” Manchin asserted, highlighting the chaotic implications of stripping away such an essential tool for governance.
Moreover, Manchin's refusal to back Harris signals a significant rift within the Democratic Party.
This internal conflict showcases that even within the party, there are growing concerns about the potential consequences of eliminating the filibuster, especially when it comes to abortion legislation.
Implementing such a drastic rule change could lead to unforeseen repercussions if Republicans regain control of Congress, allowing them to implement their own legislative priorities swiftly.
Many are now left questioning how Democrat strategies, particularly proposals from the left, will impact future governance.
The risk of setting a precedent that could lead to divisive and unilateral decision-making is a live concern among not just conservatives but moderate Democrats as well.
As this critical situation unfolds, the GOP and its supporters are positioned to capitalize on the left's contentious push, as the implications of Harris' plans could resonate through the 2024 Election cycle and beyond.
In a system designed to encourage dialogue and compromise, the potential elimination of the filibuster serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of democracy when ideological extremism takes the helm.
As these plans develop, Americans should brace for the broader ramifications of such politically charged decisions, especially as the new election season approaches.
Sources:
twitchy.com
cc.bingj.comhttps%3a%2f%2fwa
aol.com
Latest News