Kamala Harris: From Anti-ICE to Border Security Flip
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 61 days ago
**Hypocrisy**
A newly resurfaced video has resurfaced, shedding light on Vice President Kamala Harris’s radical past on immigration.
In a clip from 2018, Harris was seen chanting “down with deportation” alongside former actor Jussie Smollett and a crowd of far-left protesters.
The rallying cry included slogans that echoed the left’s anti-ICE sentiment, a position Harris once fervently supported.
She has previously characterized Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as a group comparable to the KKK, expressing a clear desire to “reexamine” the organization and its role in American immigration enforcement.
Fast forward to today, and the story shifts dramatically.
Despite her historical calls to abolish ICE and accusations against the agency, Harris has conveniently shifted her stance, now echoing campaign rhetoric that aligns with securing the border—a position notably championed by Donald Trump.
This abrupt change raises questions about her authenticity, particularly in light of her earlier fervor for policies that many argue have exacerbated the current border crisis.
Adding to the intrigue, hundreds of establishment figures, including former officials from both Republican and Democratic administrations, have rallied behind Harris’s campaign.
Their endorsement illuminates a troubling pattern of support for status quo politicians who are often disconnected from the core values and concerns of everyday Americans.
The language used in their endorsement suggests a preference for “serious leadership” over “vengeful impulsiveness,” eerily omitting any acknowledgment of the failures seen under the current administration that Harris is part of.
Republican leaders have highlighted the distinct contrast between their agenda, which emphasizes a secure border and an America-first foreign policy, and the establishment mentality of endorsing Harris.
For many voters, this endorsement from Washington insiders could signal a return to the kind of ineffective governance that led to painful national security decisions and reckless border policies.
As the 2024 election cycle heats up, the choice could not be clearer: a return to leadership that prioritizes American sovereignty and security, or a continuation of the dangerous progressive agenda that Harris embodies.
The question remains—will Americans see through the veil of hypocrisy, or will they be swayed by the polished narratives of establishment figures?
As history demonstrates, voters are increasingly dissatisfied with the political elite’s failures, and many are turning towards candidates who promise to uphold traditional values and ensure the well-being of all Americans.
Sources:
infowars.com
theblaze.com
thepostmillennial.com
A newly resurfaced video has resurfaced, shedding light on Vice President Kamala Harris’s radical past on immigration.
In a clip from 2018, Harris was seen chanting “down with deportation” alongside former actor Jussie Smollett and a crowd of far-left protesters.
The rallying cry included slogans that echoed the left’s anti-ICE sentiment, a position Harris once fervently supported.
She has previously characterized Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as a group comparable to the KKK, expressing a clear desire to “reexamine” the organization and its role in American immigration enforcement.
Fast forward to today, and the story shifts dramatically.
Despite her historical calls to abolish ICE and accusations against the agency, Harris has conveniently shifted her stance, now echoing campaign rhetoric that aligns with securing the border—a position notably championed by Donald Trump.
This abrupt change raises questions about her authenticity, particularly in light of her earlier fervor for policies that many argue have exacerbated the current border crisis.
Adding to the intrigue, hundreds of establishment figures, including former officials from both Republican and Democratic administrations, have rallied behind Harris’s campaign.
Their endorsement illuminates a troubling pattern of support for status quo politicians who are often disconnected from the core values and concerns of everyday Americans.
The language used in their endorsement suggests a preference for “serious leadership” over “vengeful impulsiveness,” eerily omitting any acknowledgment of the failures seen under the current administration that Harris is part of.
Republican leaders have highlighted the distinct contrast between their agenda, which emphasizes a secure border and an America-first foreign policy, and the establishment mentality of endorsing Harris.
For many voters, this endorsement from Washington insiders could signal a return to the kind of ineffective governance that led to painful national security decisions and reckless border policies.
As the 2024 election cycle heats up, the choice could not be clearer: a return to leadership that prioritizes American sovereignty and security, or a continuation of the dangerous progressive agenda that Harris embodies.
The question remains—will Americans see through the veil of hypocrisy, or will they be swayed by the polished narratives of establishment figures?
As history demonstrates, voters are increasingly dissatisfied with the political elite’s failures, and many are turning towards candidates who promise to uphold traditional values and ensure the well-being of all Americans.
Sources:
infowars.com
theblaze.com
thepostmillennial.com
Latest News