Harris's Endorsements Reveal Hypocrisy and Desperation
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Clown World: The Endorsement that Epitomizes Kamala Harris's Descent into Irrelevance**
As the political landscape heats up ahead of the 2024 election, Vice President Kamala Harris has received a plethora of endorsements that paint a troubling picture of her candidacy.
Once known for her unyielding stance against corporate influence and the establishment, Harris now attracts support from some of the very entities that she and her party previously criticized.
This stark shift is highlighted by Harris’s recent endorsements from high-ranking national security officials, major banks, and even the IRS, showcasing the lengths to which the Democrat establishment is willing to go to shore up support for a candidate increasingly viewed as a puppet of elite interests.
Notably, Harris’s backing from over 700 national security officials raises eyebrows.
Their endorsement appears less a testament to her leadership qualities and more an effort to undermine the candidacy of former President Donald Trump, whom they label as “scary” and “authoritarian.”
Could this simply be an example of the left falling in line behind figures who represent the very power structures they once claimed to oppose?
Adding another layer to the absurdity, Harris has secured the endorsement of Goldman Sachs, which is now promoting the idea of a Democrat sweep in the upcoming elections.
Despite the party's historical opposition to corporate greed, it seems Democratic voters are ready to embrace a candidate who, they believe, will align with these corporate giants for economic gain.
Does Harris's appeal to major banks resonate with many everyday Americans? Likely not.
In an unprecedented move, the National Treasury Employees Union, representing IRS agents, has also endorsed Harris’s campaign, further demonstrating how far the Democratic Party has strayed from its roots.
Once a target of frustration and scorn, the IRS is now being welcomed into the fold by a party that previously condemned such bureaucratic entities.
The question remains: What do these endorsements say about the party's direction?
It seems that Democrats are willing to overlook their past grievances against the IRS, national security agencies, and corporate power when it serves their political interests.
The irony is rich—individuals who once stood against big banks and government overreach are now praising a candidate that sits comfortably in their embrace.
The Harris campaign’s ability to gain support from such eclectic sources signifies a shift in allegiance among party members who are seemingly more concerned with maintaining their grip on power rather than representing the interests of the American people.
As the election season unfolds, it is crucial for voters to reconcile the endorsements Harris is touting with her record and the ideals she originally claimed to champion.
Her alignment with figures like Liz Cheney and endorsements from the IRS and major financial institutions expose a disconnect that could serve as a wake-up call to discerning voters.
The upcoming election is not merely another contest; it is a litmus test for whether Americans will choose to dismantle the established political norm or continue to endorse candidates steeped in contradictions.
The narrative leading up to the 2024 elections is set, and it’s clear that the clash between establishment interests and true representation is far from over.
Sources:
jdrucker.substack.com
rumble.com
campusreform.org
As the political landscape heats up ahead of the 2024 election, Vice President Kamala Harris has received a plethora of endorsements that paint a troubling picture of her candidacy.
Once known for her unyielding stance against corporate influence and the establishment, Harris now attracts support from some of the very entities that she and her party previously criticized.
This stark shift is highlighted by Harris’s recent endorsements from high-ranking national security officials, major banks, and even the IRS, showcasing the lengths to which the Democrat establishment is willing to go to shore up support for a candidate increasingly viewed as a puppet of elite interests.
Notably, Harris’s backing from over 700 national security officials raises eyebrows.
Their endorsement appears less a testament to her leadership qualities and more an effort to undermine the candidacy of former President Donald Trump, whom they label as “scary” and “authoritarian.”
Could this simply be an example of the left falling in line behind figures who represent the very power structures they once claimed to oppose?
Adding another layer to the absurdity, Harris has secured the endorsement of Goldman Sachs, which is now promoting the idea of a Democrat sweep in the upcoming elections.
Despite the party's historical opposition to corporate greed, it seems Democratic voters are ready to embrace a candidate who, they believe, will align with these corporate giants for economic gain.
Does Harris's appeal to major banks resonate with many everyday Americans? Likely not.
In an unprecedented move, the National Treasury Employees Union, representing IRS agents, has also endorsed Harris’s campaign, further demonstrating how far the Democratic Party has strayed from its roots.
Once a target of frustration and scorn, the IRS is now being welcomed into the fold by a party that previously condemned such bureaucratic entities.
The question remains: What do these endorsements say about the party's direction?
It seems that Democrats are willing to overlook their past grievances against the IRS, national security agencies, and corporate power when it serves their political interests.
The irony is rich—individuals who once stood against big banks and government overreach are now praising a candidate that sits comfortably in their embrace.
The Harris campaign’s ability to gain support from such eclectic sources signifies a shift in allegiance among party members who are seemingly more concerned with maintaining their grip on power rather than representing the interests of the American people.
As the election season unfolds, it is crucial for voters to reconcile the endorsements Harris is touting with her record and the ideals she originally claimed to champion.
Her alignment with figures like Liz Cheney and endorsements from the IRS and major financial institutions expose a disconnect that could serve as a wake-up call to discerning voters.
The upcoming election is not merely another contest; it is a litmus test for whether Americans will choose to dismantle the established political norm or continue to endorse candidates steeped in contradictions.
The narrative leading up to the 2024 elections is set, and it’s clear that the clash between establishment interests and true representation is far from over.
Sources:
jdrucker.substack.com
rumble.com
campusreform.org
Latest News