CISA's Censorship Tactics Threaten Free Speech Rights
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 68 days ago
**Censorship Under Fire: CISA's Evasive Tactics Raise Eyebrows**
Congressional scrutiny is heating up as House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan has alerted the public to serious concerns regarding the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's (CISA) involvement in election-related censorship.
In a recent exclusive report, Jordan accused CISA Director Jen Easterly of dodging Congress's inquiries about her agency's actions related to content moderation. This evasiveness raises questions about CISA's commitment to transparency and its role in the upcoming 2024 presidential election.
Easterly was invited to testify regarding CISA's collaboration with government entities aimed at "mitigating threats" to elections—a euphemism that has been used in past instances to justify censorship of lawful speech, particularly concerning the 2020 election.
Jordan's letter outlines a troubling pattern, alleging that CISA is working in concert with Democratic-led states to suppress information that does not align with their narrative. Notably, the agency's involvement in Pennsylvania's newly formed "Election Threats Task Force" has been highlighted, where efforts are underway to quash what they deem "misinformation."
The sequence of events leading to Easterly's refusal to testify raises further red flags. Despite multiple requests to provide alternative dates for her testimony, CISA has repeatedly claimed her unavailability, stalling the inquiry for over a month.
In his correspondence, Jordan emphasizes the importance of CISA complying with a congressional subpoena requiring the agency to disclose communications regarding content moderation. What’s particularly concerning is CISA's history of labeling factual discourse as “malinformation,” thereby encouraging suppression of viewpoint diversity that could influence a fair democratic process.
Moreover, the implications of such actions are grave as they directly undermine the principles of free speech. If valid concerns about election security are mischaracterized as misinformation, the impact on public discourse and electoral integrity could be profound.
As the 2024 election approaches, the American public deserves clarity and accountability from government entities tasked with protecting rather than infringing upon constitutional rights. The apparent refusal by Easterly and CISA raises inevitable questions about which side of free expression the agency truly stands on.
Chairman Jordan’s commitment to uncovering the truth surrounding these allegations is commendable, and it underscores a growing concern among conservatives regarding possible government overreach in the realm of speech and the rule of law.
If the agency has nothing to hide, Easterly should welcome the opportunity to address these issues publicly. The American people are watching closely as this story unfolds, eager for transparency in an era defined by increasing governmental scrutiny of individual rights.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
theblaze.com
rumble.com
Congressional scrutiny is heating up as House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan has alerted the public to serious concerns regarding the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's (CISA) involvement in election-related censorship.
In a recent exclusive report, Jordan accused CISA Director Jen Easterly of dodging Congress's inquiries about her agency's actions related to content moderation. This evasiveness raises questions about CISA's commitment to transparency and its role in the upcoming 2024 presidential election.
Easterly was invited to testify regarding CISA's collaboration with government entities aimed at "mitigating threats" to elections—a euphemism that has been used in past instances to justify censorship of lawful speech, particularly concerning the 2020 election.
Jordan's letter outlines a troubling pattern, alleging that CISA is working in concert with Democratic-led states to suppress information that does not align with their narrative. Notably, the agency's involvement in Pennsylvania's newly formed "Election Threats Task Force" has been highlighted, where efforts are underway to quash what they deem "misinformation."
The sequence of events leading to Easterly's refusal to testify raises further red flags. Despite multiple requests to provide alternative dates for her testimony, CISA has repeatedly claimed her unavailability, stalling the inquiry for over a month.
In his correspondence, Jordan emphasizes the importance of CISA complying with a congressional subpoena requiring the agency to disclose communications regarding content moderation. What’s particularly concerning is CISA's history of labeling factual discourse as “malinformation,” thereby encouraging suppression of viewpoint diversity that could influence a fair democratic process.
Moreover, the implications of such actions are grave as they directly undermine the principles of free speech. If valid concerns about election security are mischaracterized as misinformation, the impact on public discourse and electoral integrity could be profound.
As the 2024 election approaches, the American public deserves clarity and accountability from government entities tasked with protecting rather than infringing upon constitutional rights. The apparent refusal by Easterly and CISA raises inevitable questions about which side of free expression the agency truly stands on.
Chairman Jordan’s commitment to uncovering the truth surrounding these allegations is commendable, and it underscores a growing concern among conservatives regarding possible government overreach in the realm of speech and the rule of law.
If the agency has nothing to hide, Easterly should welcome the opportunity to address these issues publicly. The American people are watching closely as this story unfolds, eager for transparency in an era defined by increasing governmental scrutiny of individual rights.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
theblaze.com
rumble.com
Latest News