Vaccination Data Raises Questions About Safety and Efficacy
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 days ago
**Unmasking the Vaccine Deception: Data Points to a Troubling Reality**
Recent revelations challenge the narrative surrounding COVID-19 vaccinations, raising critical questions about their safety and efficacy.
A recent analysis of data released from New Zealand by Barry Young sheds light on alarming statistics that seem to contradict prevailing health messages. Young's findings indicate that the one-year mortality rates following vaccination vary significantly across different batches, with some showing a staggering two-fold difference.
This inconsistency is not merely a statistical anomaly; it represents a profound concern regarding the vaccines' safety profiles. In a standard scenario where vaccines are safe, mortality rates should display a normal distribution, as guaranteed by the central limit theorem. However, Young's analysis highlights that this is not the case.
For instance, when examining batches administered to individuals aged 80-84, the variation in mortality was striking enough to warrant serious reconsideration of the vaccine’s promise. Such discrepancies in batch data suggest a fundamental flaw in how these vaccines have been marketed and administered.
Critics of the vaccines, including Dr. Bryan Ardis, have been vocal about what they term "one of the greatest lies ever told to humanity by medicine." This assertion resonates with a growing segment of the population that feels betrayed by health authorities and mainstream media, which often dismisses these concerns as mere conspiracy theories.
Moreover, the reluctance of official health organizations to investigate adverse effects further fuels skepticism. With studies consistently failing to provide data that aligns with a narrative of vaccine safety, the credibility of health authorities faces an increasing challenge.
As distrust in public health institutions mounts, more individuals are demanding transparency and accountability. A segment of the population is growing more willing to confront the uncomfortable truths surrounding vaccination, calling for a re-examination of the protocols that have dominated health discussions since the pandemic's onset.
The implications of this analysis could extend beyond public health; they may also influence the political landscape as concerns mount around government accountability and the fallout from health policies that have been largely one-sided.
As the narrative shifts, it is crucial for individuals to remain informed and vigilant, seeking out diverse sources and viewpoints in this evolving discussion. The ongoing scrutiny of the vaccine data not only calls into question the overall management of the pandemic but also points to a need for a renewed commitment to truth and transparency in our health systems.
Sources:
rumble.com
kirschsubstack.com
threadreaderapp.com
Recent revelations challenge the narrative surrounding COVID-19 vaccinations, raising critical questions about their safety and efficacy.
A recent analysis of data released from New Zealand by Barry Young sheds light on alarming statistics that seem to contradict prevailing health messages. Young's findings indicate that the one-year mortality rates following vaccination vary significantly across different batches, with some showing a staggering two-fold difference.
This inconsistency is not merely a statistical anomaly; it represents a profound concern regarding the vaccines' safety profiles. In a standard scenario where vaccines are safe, mortality rates should display a normal distribution, as guaranteed by the central limit theorem. However, Young's analysis highlights that this is not the case.
For instance, when examining batches administered to individuals aged 80-84, the variation in mortality was striking enough to warrant serious reconsideration of the vaccine’s promise. Such discrepancies in batch data suggest a fundamental flaw in how these vaccines have been marketed and administered.
Critics of the vaccines, including Dr. Bryan Ardis, have been vocal about what they term "one of the greatest lies ever told to humanity by medicine." This assertion resonates with a growing segment of the population that feels betrayed by health authorities and mainstream media, which often dismisses these concerns as mere conspiracy theories.
Moreover, the reluctance of official health organizations to investigate adverse effects further fuels skepticism. With studies consistently failing to provide data that aligns with a narrative of vaccine safety, the credibility of health authorities faces an increasing challenge.
As distrust in public health institutions mounts, more individuals are demanding transparency and accountability. A segment of the population is growing more willing to confront the uncomfortable truths surrounding vaccination, calling for a re-examination of the protocols that have dominated health discussions since the pandemic's onset.
The implications of this analysis could extend beyond public health; they may also influence the political landscape as concerns mount around government accountability and the fallout from health policies that have been largely one-sided.
As the narrative shifts, it is crucial for individuals to remain informed and vigilant, seeking out diverse sources and viewpoints in this evolving discussion. The ongoing scrutiny of the vaccine data not only calls into question the overall management of the pandemic but also points to a need for a renewed commitment to truth and transparency in our health systems.
Sources:
rumble.com
kirschsubstack.com
threadreaderapp.com
Latest News