Supreme Court Grants Trump 'Absolute Immunity', Major Blow to NY Case
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 days ago
The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of former President Donald Trump, granting him "absolute immunity" for official acts within his constitutional authority. This ruling deals a significant blow to the New York case against Trump led by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
In a 6-3 decision, the court concluded that under the constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power requires that a former President have some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts during his tenure in office. The court stated that this immunity must be absolute with respect to the President's exercise of his core constitutional powers.
The ruling further stated that the President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and that not everything the President does is official. The President is not above the law. However, Congress may not criminalize the President's conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution.
Trump celebrated the ruling as a "big win" and declared that he is now "free to campaign." This ruling has significant implications for the future of the Supreme Court and the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches of government.
It is worth noting that this ruling comes as Trump is considering another run for the presidency in 2024. This decision by the Supreme Court could have a major impact on his campaign and the broader political landscape.
The ruling also highlights the ongoing debate over the limits of executive power and the role of the judiciary in checking that power. This decision is likely to be hailed as a victory by conservatives who have long argued for a strong executive branch with broad powers.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of Trump is a significant development with far-reaching implications for the future of the presidency and the balance of power between the branches of government. As the political landscape continues to evolve, this decision will undoubtedly be a topic of intense debate and discussion.
Sources:
amgreatness.com
notthebee.com
In a 6-3 decision, the court concluded that under the constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power requires that a former President have some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts during his tenure in office. The court stated that this immunity must be absolute with respect to the President's exercise of his core constitutional powers.
The ruling further stated that the President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and that not everything the President does is official. The President is not above the law. However, Congress may not criminalize the President's conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution.
Trump celebrated the ruling as a "big win" and declared that he is now "free to campaign." This ruling has significant implications for the future of the Supreme Court and the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches of government.
It is worth noting that this ruling comes as Trump is considering another run for the presidency in 2024. This decision by the Supreme Court could have a major impact on his campaign and the broader political landscape.
The ruling also highlights the ongoing debate over the limits of executive power and the role of the judiciary in checking that power. This decision is likely to be hailed as a victory by conservatives who have long argued for a strong executive branch with broad powers.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of Trump is a significant development with far-reaching implications for the future of the presidency and the balance of power between the branches of government. As the political landscape continues to evolve, this decision will undoubtedly be a topic of intense debate and discussion.
Sources:
amgreatness.com
notthebee.com
Latest News
