Tennessee Advances Bill Labeling mRNA Vaccines As Bioweapons
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
The state of Tennessee is poised to set a bold precedent in the ongoing debate surrounding mRNA vaccines.
A new bill, dubbed the "mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act" (SB 1949), has recently been introduced in the Tennessee General Assembly.
The legislation seeks to classify mRNA injections and products as weapons of mass destruction.
If this bill is enacted, it would criminalize not only the manufacture and possession of these products but also impose stringent penalties on state and local officials who fail to enforce the law effectively.
With rising skepticism about mRNA technologies in light of recent data linking COVID-19 vaccines to significant adverse events, the bill comes as a response to concerns voiced by citizens and lawmakers alike.
According to reports, nearly 39,000 deaths have been associated with mRNA shots, though experts warn that this figure represents only a fraction of the actual adverse events reported.
Advocates of this legislation believe it bridges the gap between public health policy and criminal law by framing mRNA technologies as unsafe interventions rather than beneficial medical advancements.
Introduced by Senator Janice Bowling, SB 1949 has already gained traction in the Senate, having passed its first and second readings.
The bill emphasizes a shift in how state authorities will address the growing controversy over mRNA technology, classifying it alongside other prohibited weapons under Tennessee law.
The implications of this legislation extend beyond criminalization; it includes provisions for private citizens to sue the state for non-enforcement, thus empowering communities to take a stand against government inaction.
As skepticism around mRNA products mounts across the United States, Tennessee's bold move may inspire similar legislation in other states.
The bill reflects a broader trend among conservative lawmakers who prioritize individual liberties and seek accountability in public health decisions.
With public confidence in health interventions at a low, this legislation stands as a clarion call for transparency and regulatory oversight.
As the bill moves forward, it will undoubtedly spark significant debate and could reshape the landscape of vaccine policies and public trust in health mandates.
Sources:
americanthinker.com
modernity.news
nypost.com
A new bill, dubbed the "mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act" (SB 1949), has recently been introduced in the Tennessee General Assembly.
The legislation seeks to classify mRNA injections and products as weapons of mass destruction.
If this bill is enacted, it would criminalize not only the manufacture and possession of these products but also impose stringent penalties on state and local officials who fail to enforce the law effectively.
With rising skepticism about mRNA technologies in light of recent data linking COVID-19 vaccines to significant adverse events, the bill comes as a response to concerns voiced by citizens and lawmakers alike.
According to reports, nearly 39,000 deaths have been associated with mRNA shots, though experts warn that this figure represents only a fraction of the actual adverse events reported.
Advocates of this legislation believe it bridges the gap between public health policy and criminal law by framing mRNA technologies as unsafe interventions rather than beneficial medical advancements.
Introduced by Senator Janice Bowling, SB 1949 has already gained traction in the Senate, having passed its first and second readings.
The bill emphasizes a shift in how state authorities will address the growing controversy over mRNA technology, classifying it alongside other prohibited weapons under Tennessee law.
The implications of this legislation extend beyond criminalization; it includes provisions for private citizens to sue the state for non-enforcement, thus empowering communities to take a stand against government inaction.
As skepticism around mRNA products mounts across the United States, Tennessee's bold move may inspire similar legislation in other states.
The bill reflects a broader trend among conservative lawmakers who prioritize individual liberties and seek accountability in public health decisions.
With public confidence in health interventions at a low, this legislation stands as a clarion call for transparency and regulatory oversight.
As the bill moves forward, it will undoubtedly spark significant debate and could reshape the landscape of vaccine policies and public trust in health mandates.
Sources:
americanthinker.com
modernity.news
nypost.com
Latest News