Notre Dame Students Stand Against Pro-Abortion Professor's Appointment
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 4 hours ago
A shocking decision is sending waves across the academic landscape as students at the University of Notre Dame defiantly oppose the appointment of a pro-abortion professor to a key position.
The university has chosen Susan Ostermann, known for her advocacy for abortion, to lead the Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies.
This move has sparked outrage among students, particularly those aligned with the Notre Dame Right to Life Executive Board.
Their argument rests on the premise that Ostermann’s views contradict the Catholic institution's commitment to the sanctity of life.
With her history of promoting abortion as “health care,” students are voicing their concerns that Ostermann’s beliefs are not compatible with the university’s moral foundations.
The Right to Life group emphasized that appointing Ostermann is a betrayal of the institution's values.
They point to her affiliations with the Population Council, an organization linked to abortion advocacy, and her statements that downplay the humanity of unborn babies.
Anna Kelley, president of the group and a Catholic adoptee from China, offered a poignant personal testimony.
She expressed her dismay at Ostermann’s history of supporting policies that led to the loss of countless innocent lives.
Kelley stressed that her own story is a testament to the value of life and emphasized the real-world consequences of the ideological battles surrounding abortion.
The controversy surrounding Ostermann’s appointment highlights a broader trend of concern among many in the pro-life community.
Critics warn that universities, particularly those with religious affiliations, risk sacrificing their moral integrity by aligning with figures who promote anti-life ideologies.
Rev. Wilson D. Miscamble, a professor emeritus at Notre Dame, echoed these sentiments, labeling the appointment a "travesty" and calling for the university’s Board of Fellows to intervene.
He raised alarm that such choices could undermine the institution’s core Catholic identity.
As the student body rallies against this appointment, they send a clear message: the fight for life remains at the forefront of their values.
Their determination reflects a growing resistance against the normalization of pro-abortion policies in academia.
With students standing firm in their beliefs, it’s crucial for institutions to recognize the implications of their leadership choices.
As this situation unfolds, it reinforces the importance of upholding the principles of life and conscience in all spheres of society, particularly in educational environments.
Sources:
discernreport.com
nytimes.com
lifenews.com
The university has chosen Susan Ostermann, known for her advocacy for abortion, to lead the Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies.
This move has sparked outrage among students, particularly those aligned with the Notre Dame Right to Life Executive Board.
Their argument rests on the premise that Ostermann’s views contradict the Catholic institution's commitment to the sanctity of life.
With her history of promoting abortion as “health care,” students are voicing their concerns that Ostermann’s beliefs are not compatible with the university’s moral foundations.
The Right to Life group emphasized that appointing Ostermann is a betrayal of the institution's values.
They point to her affiliations with the Population Council, an organization linked to abortion advocacy, and her statements that downplay the humanity of unborn babies.
Anna Kelley, president of the group and a Catholic adoptee from China, offered a poignant personal testimony.
She expressed her dismay at Ostermann’s history of supporting policies that led to the loss of countless innocent lives.
Kelley stressed that her own story is a testament to the value of life and emphasized the real-world consequences of the ideological battles surrounding abortion.
The controversy surrounding Ostermann’s appointment highlights a broader trend of concern among many in the pro-life community.
Critics warn that universities, particularly those with religious affiliations, risk sacrificing their moral integrity by aligning with figures who promote anti-life ideologies.
Rev. Wilson D. Miscamble, a professor emeritus at Notre Dame, echoed these sentiments, labeling the appointment a "travesty" and calling for the university’s Board of Fellows to intervene.
He raised alarm that such choices could undermine the institution’s core Catholic identity.
As the student body rallies against this appointment, they send a clear message: the fight for life remains at the forefront of their values.
Their determination reflects a growing resistance against the normalization of pro-abortion policies in academia.
With students standing firm in their beliefs, it’s crucial for institutions to recognize the implications of their leadership choices.
As this situation unfolds, it reinforces the importance of upholding the principles of life and conscience in all spheres of society, particularly in educational environments.
Sources:
discernreport.com
nytimes.com
lifenews.com
Latest News