Biden Administration's COVID Policy Ignores Natural Immunity
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Revelations About COVID Policy Show Disturbing Bias Against Natural Immunity**
Emerging revelations from emails obtained through the Freedom of Information Act have ignited a firestorm of discussion regarding the Biden administration's handling of COVID-19 data, particularly concerning natural immunity.
The emails indicate that key health officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins, were aware of evidence suggesting that natural immunity could provide more robust protection against the virus than the vaccines, especially before implementing sweeping federal vaccine mandates in 2021.
A significant Israeli study involving nearly 800,000 individuals indicated that natural immunity was substantially more effective, offering 13 times greater protection against reinfection and 27 times more against symptomatic COVID compared to the Pfizer vaccine.
Despite this compelling evidence, it appears that public health officials chose to dismiss or downplay these findings for the sake of maintaining a simplified narrative that focused on vaccination as the sole solution.
Michael Chamberlain, director of Protect the Public’s Trust, highlighted the emails' findings as evidence that the public health bureaucracy is in desperate need of reform.
Chamberlain asserted that the desire to bury research contradicting the government's agenda was clear, stating, “Americans were left relying on foreign data despite billions in federal funding.”
The narrative that vaccination should be prioritized over natural immunity has persisted in public discourse, further amplified by health officials using selective studies to justify vaccine advocacy. This contrasts with the earlier acknowledgment that natural infection might yield strong immunity, a point some officials seem to have conveniently forgotten.
In a telling moment, Dr. Fauci referred to the Israeli study as “impressive,” yet the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continued to promote less rigorous studies that favored vaccination.
The implications are clear: as new evidence challenges the stringent push for universal vaccination, concerns grow about the integrity of the health decisions made during the pandemic.
This ongoing saga raises critical questions about trust in health authorities and the need for a more nuanced approach that embraces diverse pathways to immunity, rather than a one-size-fits-all mandate.
As the political landscape evolves, the public deserves transparency and a commitment to data-driven policies, moving forward from the missteps of previous administrations.
In light of this revelation, it remains crucial for lawmakers and health officials to reconsider their stance on natural immunity and ensure that scientific integrity is prioritized over bureaucratic expediency.
Sources:
justthenews.com
amgreatness.com
nypost.com
Emerging revelations from emails obtained through the Freedom of Information Act have ignited a firestorm of discussion regarding the Biden administration's handling of COVID-19 data, particularly concerning natural immunity.
The emails indicate that key health officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins, were aware of evidence suggesting that natural immunity could provide more robust protection against the virus than the vaccines, especially before implementing sweeping federal vaccine mandates in 2021.
A significant Israeli study involving nearly 800,000 individuals indicated that natural immunity was substantially more effective, offering 13 times greater protection against reinfection and 27 times more against symptomatic COVID compared to the Pfizer vaccine.
Despite this compelling evidence, it appears that public health officials chose to dismiss or downplay these findings for the sake of maintaining a simplified narrative that focused on vaccination as the sole solution.
Michael Chamberlain, director of Protect the Public’s Trust, highlighted the emails' findings as evidence that the public health bureaucracy is in desperate need of reform.
Chamberlain asserted that the desire to bury research contradicting the government's agenda was clear, stating, “Americans were left relying on foreign data despite billions in federal funding.”
The narrative that vaccination should be prioritized over natural immunity has persisted in public discourse, further amplified by health officials using selective studies to justify vaccine advocacy. This contrasts with the earlier acknowledgment that natural infection might yield strong immunity, a point some officials seem to have conveniently forgotten.
In a telling moment, Dr. Fauci referred to the Israeli study as “impressive,” yet the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continued to promote less rigorous studies that favored vaccination.
The implications are clear: as new evidence challenges the stringent push for universal vaccination, concerns grow about the integrity of the health decisions made during the pandemic.
This ongoing saga raises critical questions about trust in health authorities and the need for a more nuanced approach that embraces diverse pathways to immunity, rather than a one-size-fits-all mandate.
As the political landscape evolves, the public deserves transparency and a commitment to data-driven policies, moving forward from the missteps of previous administrations.
In light of this revelation, it remains crucial for lawmakers and health officials to reconsider their stance on natural immunity and ensure that scientific integrity is prioritized over bureaucratic expediency.
Sources:
justthenews.com
amgreatness.com
nypost.com
Latest News