Censorship Exposed: Vaccine Study Cyberattack Uncovered
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Censorship in Medicine: The Alarming Cyberattack on a Study Exposing Vaccine-Linked Cancer Risks**
In a shocking turn of events that once again highlights the growing concerns surrounding vaccine safety, a peer-reviewed study examining potential links between COVID-19 vaccinations and an increase in cancer diagnoses has fallen victim to a deliberate cyberattack.
Published in the medical journal Oncotarget on January 3, the groundbreaking study analyzed data from 333 cases of new or rapidly progressing cancers associated with vaccination. The research was abridged from 69 studies across 27 nations, revealing alarming patterns that warrant further scrutiny.
Days following its publication, Oncotarget's website was mysteriously disabled, throwing into question the integrity of the scientific discourse surrounding the vaccines. The journal has since reported the incident to the FBI, suggesting a targeted act of suppression aimed at silencing critical inquiry into essential public health discussions.
Lead researchers Dr. Wafik El-Deiry and Dr. Charlotte Kuperwasser acknowledged that while their findings do not prove direct causation, they noted concerning trends, including aggressive tumor growth near injection sites and reactivation of dormant cancers post-vaccination. These observations are not isolated; a U.S. military study reported increased cases of blood cancers among service members following the 2021 vaccine rollout, while analyses from Italy and South Korea echoed similar escalations across various types of cancer post-vaccination.
The incident raises poignant questions about the role of censorship in medicine and the trustworthiness of public health narratives. For years, dissenting voices regarding vaccine safety have been routinely marginalized or dismissed outright, even as some early concerns, such as those regarding myocarditis, later gained traction and acknowledgment.
Dr. El-Deiry decried the cyberattack, stating, "Censorship is alive and well in the U.S., and it has come into medicine in a big, awful way." This sentiment resonates with many who question why promising research that could inform public health decisions is so often suppressed.
The cyberattack’s timing is particularly troubling, raising suspicions of coordinated efforts to obscure critical information from the public. Such actions stifle transparency and threaten the foundational principles of medical autonomy and the patient-physician relationship.
With the push for re-evaluating vaccine efficacy and safety more urgent than ever, the disappearance of this critical study only fuels further distrust in public health institutions perceived as protective of their narratives rather than committed to the truth.
As the medical community grapples with these alarming developments, the message is clear: an open dialogue on vaccine safety is essential for rebuilding public trust and ensuring that patient rights remain a priority in a system increasingly influenced by political agendas.
The restoration of Oncotarget's website and access to the now-censored research is eagerly awaited by those who advocate for transparency and scientific integrity. In a time when mistrust in institutions is rampant, it’s imperative that dissenting opinions and critical research are not silenced.
In a democracy grounded in confidence and accountability, every citizen should be empowered to make informed decisions about their health, free from the overreach of governmental censorship and suppression of scientific inquiry. It is a call to action for everyone to demand an environment where scientific data—not political agendas—guides our health decisions.
Sources:
kirschsubstack.com
naturalnews.com
zerohedge.com
In a shocking turn of events that once again highlights the growing concerns surrounding vaccine safety, a peer-reviewed study examining potential links between COVID-19 vaccinations and an increase in cancer diagnoses has fallen victim to a deliberate cyberattack.
Published in the medical journal Oncotarget on January 3, the groundbreaking study analyzed data from 333 cases of new or rapidly progressing cancers associated with vaccination. The research was abridged from 69 studies across 27 nations, revealing alarming patterns that warrant further scrutiny.
Days following its publication, Oncotarget's website was mysteriously disabled, throwing into question the integrity of the scientific discourse surrounding the vaccines. The journal has since reported the incident to the FBI, suggesting a targeted act of suppression aimed at silencing critical inquiry into essential public health discussions.
Lead researchers Dr. Wafik El-Deiry and Dr. Charlotte Kuperwasser acknowledged that while their findings do not prove direct causation, they noted concerning trends, including aggressive tumor growth near injection sites and reactivation of dormant cancers post-vaccination. These observations are not isolated; a U.S. military study reported increased cases of blood cancers among service members following the 2021 vaccine rollout, while analyses from Italy and South Korea echoed similar escalations across various types of cancer post-vaccination.
The incident raises poignant questions about the role of censorship in medicine and the trustworthiness of public health narratives. For years, dissenting voices regarding vaccine safety have been routinely marginalized or dismissed outright, even as some early concerns, such as those regarding myocarditis, later gained traction and acknowledgment.
Dr. El-Deiry decried the cyberattack, stating, "Censorship is alive and well in the U.S., and it has come into medicine in a big, awful way." This sentiment resonates with many who question why promising research that could inform public health decisions is so often suppressed.
The cyberattack’s timing is particularly troubling, raising suspicions of coordinated efforts to obscure critical information from the public. Such actions stifle transparency and threaten the foundational principles of medical autonomy and the patient-physician relationship.
With the push for re-evaluating vaccine efficacy and safety more urgent than ever, the disappearance of this critical study only fuels further distrust in public health institutions perceived as protective of their narratives rather than committed to the truth.
As the medical community grapples with these alarming developments, the message is clear: an open dialogue on vaccine safety is essential for rebuilding public trust and ensuring that patient rights remain a priority in a system increasingly influenced by political agendas.
The restoration of Oncotarget's website and access to the now-censored research is eagerly awaited by those who advocate for transparency and scientific integrity. In a time when mistrust in institutions is rampant, it’s imperative that dissenting opinions and critical research are not silenced.
In a democracy grounded in confidence and accountability, every citizen should be empowered to make informed decisions about their health, free from the overreach of governmental censorship and suppression of scientific inquiry. It is a call to action for everyone to demand an environment where scientific data—not political agendas—guides our health decisions.
Sources:
kirschsubstack.com
naturalnews.com
zerohedge.com
Latest News