Wind Energy's Cost: Eagles Die for Green Ideals
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 18 hours ago
Wind Energy's Dark Side: Green Companies Face Accountability After Eagle Deaths
In a striking revelation that underscores the grim reality lurking in the shadows of the green energy movement, a green energy company has been fined over $30,000 by the Trump-era Department of the Interior after two bald eagles lost their lives due to collisions with wind turbines.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) issued a violation notice to Ørsted Onshore North America, the subsidiary of a Danish clean energy conglomerate, for failing to secure an "incidental take permit" under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.
The bald eagle, an emblem of American freedom, was found dead near wind turbines in both Nebraska and Illinois, drawing attention to the alarming consequences of the push for renewable energy without adequate safeguards for wildlife.
While the Biden administration has touted companies like Ørsted as exemplars of a successful clean energy strategy, the deaths of these eagles raise critical questions about the effectiveness of current green policies and the oversight of environmentally sensitive initiatives.
As the USFWS pointed out, Ørsted did not secure the necessary permits—a clear indication that their operations might place wildlife at risk. Despite receiving the notice and cooperating with USFWS, the company's failure to act responsibly following the first eagle death in 2024 is concerning.
Even as bald eagle populations have rebounded in recent decades, they remain vulnerable to human-made threats. The gravity of this violation cannot be ignored, particularly when it comes to projects that claim sustainability while failing to protect vital species.
Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum has previously criticized wind and solar projects for their instability and negative impact on the grid. His comments resonate with many Americans who are beginning to question the reliability of a rapid energy transition reliant on green technology.
Burgum's perspective sheds light on a broader critique of the green agenda, which often prioritizes ideological goals over practical, environmentally sound solutions.
As we enter a new chapter under the leadership of President Donald Trump—now the 47th President of the United States—there's hope that a more balanced approach to energy production will emerge, one that genuinely considers both environmental impact and energy reliability.
The fate of our national symbols like the bald eagle should serve as a stark reminder: if we are to pursue green energy, it must be done thoughtfully and with accountability, ensuring our actions today do not endanger the natural beauty of our country tomorrow.
Sources:
foxnews.com
visualcapitalist.com
visualcapitalist.com
In a striking revelation that underscores the grim reality lurking in the shadows of the green energy movement, a green energy company has been fined over $30,000 by the Trump-era Department of the Interior after two bald eagles lost their lives due to collisions with wind turbines.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) issued a violation notice to Ørsted Onshore North America, the subsidiary of a Danish clean energy conglomerate, for failing to secure an "incidental take permit" under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.
The bald eagle, an emblem of American freedom, was found dead near wind turbines in both Nebraska and Illinois, drawing attention to the alarming consequences of the push for renewable energy without adequate safeguards for wildlife.
While the Biden administration has touted companies like Ørsted as exemplars of a successful clean energy strategy, the deaths of these eagles raise critical questions about the effectiveness of current green policies and the oversight of environmentally sensitive initiatives.
As the USFWS pointed out, Ørsted did not secure the necessary permits—a clear indication that their operations might place wildlife at risk. Despite receiving the notice and cooperating with USFWS, the company's failure to act responsibly following the first eagle death in 2024 is concerning.
Even as bald eagle populations have rebounded in recent decades, they remain vulnerable to human-made threats. The gravity of this violation cannot be ignored, particularly when it comes to projects that claim sustainability while failing to protect vital species.
Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum has previously criticized wind and solar projects for their instability and negative impact on the grid. His comments resonate with many Americans who are beginning to question the reliability of a rapid energy transition reliant on green technology.
Burgum's perspective sheds light on a broader critique of the green agenda, which often prioritizes ideological goals over practical, environmentally sound solutions.
As we enter a new chapter under the leadership of President Donald Trump—now the 47th President of the United States—there's hope that a more balanced approach to energy production will emerge, one that genuinely considers both environmental impact and energy reliability.
The fate of our national symbols like the bald eagle should serve as a stark reminder: if we are to pursue green energy, it must be done thoughtfully and with accountability, ensuring our actions today do not endanger the natural beauty of our country tomorrow.
Sources:
foxnews.com
visualcapitalist.com
visualcapitalist.com
Latest News