Court Ruling Defends Second Amendment Rights in New Mexico
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
The recent ruling from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals presents a significant victory for Second Amendment rights advocates.
By rejecting New Mexico’s petition to uphold a burdensome seven-day waiting period for gun purchases, the court reaffirmed that such measures are unconstitutional.
The court's decision to strike down the "waiting period" law not only restores the rights of New Mexicans but also sets a crucial precedent for gun owners across the Tenth Circuit, impacting states like Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Kansas, and Oklahoma.
Judges highlighted that imposing cooling-off periods essentially infringes on the right to bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment.
This ruling emphasizes that rights cannot be arbitrarily delayed by the government under the guise of safety.
Supporters of this decision, including the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF), argue that waiting periods have no substantive evidence backing their effectiveness in reducing crime, suicides, or mass shootings.
Data has repeatedly shown that these waiting periods simply add an unnecessary hurdle for law-abiding citizens while failing to address the actions of criminals.
As this legal battle unfolds, it is crucial to recognize the implications of this ruling for future legislative actions regarding firearm regulations.
This decision is not merely a local concern; it resonates with conservatives nationwide who are committed to upholding the Second Amendment against encroachments that seek to undermine individual freedoms.
In an era where desperate attempts to restrict gun ownership abound, this ruling stands as a testament to the resilience of constitutional rights in America.
Sources:
thecentersquare.com
pjmedia.com
thetruthaboutguns.com
By rejecting New Mexico’s petition to uphold a burdensome seven-day waiting period for gun purchases, the court reaffirmed that such measures are unconstitutional.
The court's decision to strike down the "waiting period" law not only restores the rights of New Mexicans but also sets a crucial precedent for gun owners across the Tenth Circuit, impacting states like Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Kansas, and Oklahoma.
Judges highlighted that imposing cooling-off periods essentially infringes on the right to bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment.
This ruling emphasizes that rights cannot be arbitrarily delayed by the government under the guise of safety.
Supporters of this decision, including the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF), argue that waiting periods have no substantive evidence backing their effectiveness in reducing crime, suicides, or mass shootings.
Data has repeatedly shown that these waiting periods simply add an unnecessary hurdle for law-abiding citizens while failing to address the actions of criminals.
As this legal battle unfolds, it is crucial to recognize the implications of this ruling for future legislative actions regarding firearm regulations.
This decision is not merely a local concern; it resonates with conservatives nationwide who are committed to upholding the Second Amendment against encroachments that seek to undermine individual freedoms.
In an era where desperate attempts to restrict gun ownership abound, this ruling stands as a testament to the resilience of constitutional rights in America.
Sources:
thecentersquare.com
pjmedia.com
thetruthaboutguns.com
Latest News