The FBI is set to interview six Democratic lawmakers who recently urged military personnel to defy what they labeled as “illegal orders.”

This bold yet controversial video, featuring military veterans including Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) and Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), sparked outrage among Republicans and traditionalists alike.

President Donald Trump did not hold back in his condemnation of the video, referring to the lawmakers as “traitors” and suggesting they should face arrest for what he characterized as seditious behavior.

In response to the fallout, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth criticized Kelly, highlighting discrepancies in his display of military medals and asserting that the sentiments conveyed in the video compromise military discipline and undermine the established chain of command.

He characterized the video as a "politically-motivated influence operation," emphasizing that its vague rhetoric creates uncertainty within the military ranks, rather than upholding legal processes designed to handle unlawful orders.

Hegseth asserted that the video served to sow distrust among service members, which can have detrimental effects on unity and operational effectiveness in critical situations.

The Pentagon has now opened a formal investigation into Kelly’s actions, and discussions have arisen regarding whether he may face court-martial proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

With these escalating tensions, many conservatives are rallying behind the message of unwavering loyalty and adherence to lawful orders, showcasing the potential risks associated with politicizing military obligations.

As this situation unfolds, the implications for the integrity of our military and the rule of law are undeniably significant.

Sources:
foxnews.com
cnbc.com
dailycaller.com

Latest News