California Colleges Prioritize Ideology Over Academic Excellence
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Ideological Indoctrination: California's Gender Training Requirement for College Registration**
In an alarming move, students seeking to enroll in the University of California system are now mandated to achieve a perfect score in gender identity training, raising serious concerns about the erosion of academic standards in favor of ideological conformity.
While excellence in academics traditionally paved the way for college admission—high GPAs, stellar SAT scores, and impressive extracurricular achievements—California appears to prioritize adherence to progressive gender ideology over academic merit. This troubling trend was highlighted in a recent report revealing that even a D student using preferred pronouns would have a better chance at registration than an academically successful student who questions the prevailing views of gender.
The mandatory online training, part of a program known as SHAPE (Sexual Harassment, Anti-Discrimination, Prevention, and Education), includes scenarios that dictate how students must identify and interact with their peers based on self-declared gender identities. A sample question showcases this awkward pedagogical approach: if a transgender student insists on being identified by their preferred name, failure to comply could lead to the accusation of creating a “hostile environment.”
Critics, including leaders from Young America’s Foundation and the California Family Council, vehemently oppose these policies. They argue that they transform campuses from spaces of learning into environments of enforced ideological conformity. Greg Burt, from the California Family Council, aptly points out that such policies do not promote tolerance but rather exemplify a form of tyranny that silences those who hold traditional beliefs about gender and sexuality.
In addition to SHAPE training at the University of California, similar trends are surfacing across the California State University campuses, where students are often required to complete diversity and cultural competency courses. These requirements frequently encompass topics that push a progressive agenda, further stifling genuine discourse and debate on campus.
The potential consequences of this initiative are profound. By prioritizing ideological compliance over intellectual diversity, California is setting a dangerous precedent that undermines higher education's foundational purpose: fostering critical thinking and the exchange of diverse viewpoints. As universities increasingly adopt policies that dictate thoughts and behaviors aligned with a particular political ideology, the true essence of education may be lost.
With the Biden administration fostering legislative measures promoting identity policies, this development underscores a pressing need for state and national leaders to push back against such radical shifts in educational policy.
While some may view these requirements as steps toward a more inclusive society, many believe they threaten academic integrity and the freedom of thought vital to American education. If allowed to continue unchallenged, this trend may inhibit the next generation's ability to think critically and engage authentically with the complex social issues of our time.
Sources:
worldtribune.com
yahoo.com
americanthinker.com
In an alarming move, students seeking to enroll in the University of California system are now mandated to achieve a perfect score in gender identity training, raising serious concerns about the erosion of academic standards in favor of ideological conformity.
While excellence in academics traditionally paved the way for college admission—high GPAs, stellar SAT scores, and impressive extracurricular achievements—California appears to prioritize adherence to progressive gender ideology over academic merit. This troubling trend was highlighted in a recent report revealing that even a D student using preferred pronouns would have a better chance at registration than an academically successful student who questions the prevailing views of gender.
The mandatory online training, part of a program known as SHAPE (Sexual Harassment, Anti-Discrimination, Prevention, and Education), includes scenarios that dictate how students must identify and interact with their peers based on self-declared gender identities. A sample question showcases this awkward pedagogical approach: if a transgender student insists on being identified by their preferred name, failure to comply could lead to the accusation of creating a “hostile environment.”
Critics, including leaders from Young America’s Foundation and the California Family Council, vehemently oppose these policies. They argue that they transform campuses from spaces of learning into environments of enforced ideological conformity. Greg Burt, from the California Family Council, aptly points out that such policies do not promote tolerance but rather exemplify a form of tyranny that silences those who hold traditional beliefs about gender and sexuality.
In addition to SHAPE training at the University of California, similar trends are surfacing across the California State University campuses, where students are often required to complete diversity and cultural competency courses. These requirements frequently encompass topics that push a progressive agenda, further stifling genuine discourse and debate on campus.
The potential consequences of this initiative are profound. By prioritizing ideological compliance over intellectual diversity, California is setting a dangerous precedent that undermines higher education's foundational purpose: fostering critical thinking and the exchange of diverse viewpoints. As universities increasingly adopt policies that dictate thoughts and behaviors aligned with a particular political ideology, the true essence of education may be lost.
With the Biden administration fostering legislative measures promoting identity policies, this development underscores a pressing need for state and national leaders to push back against such radical shifts in educational policy.
While some may view these requirements as steps toward a more inclusive society, many believe they threaten academic integrity and the freedom of thought vital to American education. If allowed to continue unchallenged, this trend may inhibit the next generation's ability to think critically and engage authentically with the complex social issues of our time.
Sources:
worldtribune.com
yahoo.com
americanthinker.com
Latest News