Democrats Continue Political Prosecution Against Trump's Contingent Electors
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
Former President Donald Trump's power to pardon remains a focal point of legal and political battles, especially in the wake of harsh prosecutions initiated by Democrat attorneys general in several states.
Despite Trump issuing pardons for numerous individuals, including key figures from his administration, Democrat officials in states like Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin are pushing forward with election-related prosecutions against Trump’s contingent electors.
The Nevada Attorney General, Aaron Ford, made it clear in comments to The Daily Signal that Trump’s pardons will not deter their plans. He has initiated forgery charges against six electors, despite prior dismissals of similar charges in Clark County.
“President Trump’s actions have no bearing on our decision-making or prosecution under Nevada state law,” Ford stated.
This relentless pursuit by Democrat AGs raises critical concerns about the political motivations behind these cases. Critics argue that these prosecutions are not only unjust but also a means of targeting political opponents under the guise of legal accountability.
In Wisconsin, the Democrat attorney general has charged several associates involved in the appointment of contingent electors, emphasizing that their case remains open. Meanwhile, similar legal challenges emerge from Michigan and Georgia, where Democrat prosecutors are also pursuing charges against electors who were prepared to act should election irregularities arise.
Legal experts have weighed in, suggesting that the foundations of these state-level prosecutions are weak. Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, argues that these actions betray a deeper partisan agenda, clearly suggesting that the Democrat prosecutors are attempting to politicize what should be a constitutional process.
The contingent electors were established to step in if credible allegations of fraud could be substantiated. Their actions were taken with the guidance of legal counsel and during active litigation surrounding the election results, leading many to contend they were operating within constitutional boundaries rather than violating laws.
In light of these developments, the ongoing prosecutions against Trump’s electors could be seen as an attempt to intimidate those who participated in a legitimate political process. This raises serious questions about the role of the justice system when it becomes a tool for political gamesmanship.
Critics of the Democrat prosecutors argue that this unprecedented legal aggression against contingent electors marks a troubling trend, as these Americans now face potential years in prison and financial hardships for acting on what they believed to be their constitutional duties.
The pardons issued by Trump underscore a potent reminder of his commitment to defending his associates against what many perceive as politically motivated charges, while also challenging the partisan motives that fuel these prosecutions.
As these legal battles unfold, it is clear that the partisan divide over the 2020 election is not just a relic of the past but a reality that continues to shape the political landscape in America. The ramifications for those involved, both legally and politically, are vast and may have lasting effects on their futures.
Sources:
dailysignal.com
twitchy.com
thegatewaypundit.com
Despite Trump issuing pardons for numerous individuals, including key figures from his administration, Democrat officials in states like Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin are pushing forward with election-related prosecutions against Trump’s contingent electors.
The Nevada Attorney General, Aaron Ford, made it clear in comments to The Daily Signal that Trump’s pardons will not deter their plans. He has initiated forgery charges against six electors, despite prior dismissals of similar charges in Clark County.
“President Trump’s actions have no bearing on our decision-making or prosecution under Nevada state law,” Ford stated.
This relentless pursuit by Democrat AGs raises critical concerns about the political motivations behind these cases. Critics argue that these prosecutions are not only unjust but also a means of targeting political opponents under the guise of legal accountability.
In Wisconsin, the Democrat attorney general has charged several associates involved in the appointment of contingent electors, emphasizing that their case remains open. Meanwhile, similar legal challenges emerge from Michigan and Georgia, where Democrat prosecutors are also pursuing charges against electors who were prepared to act should election irregularities arise.
Legal experts have weighed in, suggesting that the foundations of these state-level prosecutions are weak. Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, argues that these actions betray a deeper partisan agenda, clearly suggesting that the Democrat prosecutors are attempting to politicize what should be a constitutional process.
The contingent electors were established to step in if credible allegations of fraud could be substantiated. Their actions were taken with the guidance of legal counsel and during active litigation surrounding the election results, leading many to contend they were operating within constitutional boundaries rather than violating laws.
In light of these developments, the ongoing prosecutions against Trump’s electors could be seen as an attempt to intimidate those who participated in a legitimate political process. This raises serious questions about the role of the justice system when it becomes a tool for political gamesmanship.
Critics of the Democrat prosecutors argue that this unprecedented legal aggression against contingent electors marks a troubling trend, as these Americans now face potential years in prison and financial hardships for acting on what they believed to be their constitutional duties.
The pardons issued by Trump underscore a potent reminder of his commitment to defending his associates against what many perceive as politically motivated charges, while also challenging the partisan motives that fuel these prosecutions.
As these legal battles unfold, it is clear that the partisan divide over the 2020 election is not just a relic of the past but a reality that continues to shape the political landscape in America. The ramifications for those involved, both legally and politically, are vast and may have lasting effects on their futures.
Sources:
dailysignal.com
twitchy.com
thegatewaypundit.com
Latest News