Miller Defends Trump's Supporters Against Mayes' Political Persecution
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
**Injustice**
Pinal County Attorney Brad Miller is taking a stand against Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes in what he describes as a politically motivated effort to persecute Trump supporters.
Following President Trump's pardon of 2020 presidential electors, Miller condemned Mayes' attempts to prosecute individuals who contested the election results in 2020.
Mayes has been accused of fabricating charges against these individuals solely for standing up for their rights.
Miller indicated in a statement that Mayes’ actions are not about justice but about power, aimed at intimidating conservatives and rewriting legal standards.
Drawing attention to the validity of election challenges, Miller highlighted Mayes’ own admission during a leaked phone call that the 2020 election was “challengeable.” This assertion aligns with discoveries that Arizona failed to verify voter citizenship for two decades, raising legitimate concerns about election integrity.
The County Attorney supported indicted figures like former Arizona GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward, asserting they acted lawfully as electors.
He stated, “If you wage a political war against innocent citizens, you should be held accountable—not taxpayers.” This reflects a growing frustration among conservatives who feel they are being targeted by legal actions that lack substantive grounds.
Miller chastised Mayes’ prior career as a regulator, suggesting her inexperience as a prosecutor is evident in her handling of the ongoing case. He accused her of continuing this politicized quest despite overwhelming evidence that undermines the prosecution's legitimacy.
“This pardon stops the weaponization of prosecutions,” Miller declared, arguing that the rights of citizens should not be silenced due to their political beliefs.
As he navigates this contentious landscape, Miller is calling for accountability, warning that the weaponization of the legal system could set a dangerous precedent for future elections and democratic processes.
The case represents a broader battle between political ideologies, as conservatives rally around the significance of lawful election participation, contrary to what they contend are misguided attempts by left-leaning officials to stifle dissent.
With a focus on the rights of individuals and the integrity of the electoral process, Miller's stance may resonate strongly with those advocating for justice and fairness in the political arena.
Sources:
conservativebrief.com
thegatewaypundit.com
mediaite.com
Pinal County Attorney Brad Miller is taking a stand against Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes in what he describes as a politically motivated effort to persecute Trump supporters.
Following President Trump's pardon of 2020 presidential electors, Miller condemned Mayes' attempts to prosecute individuals who contested the election results in 2020.
Mayes has been accused of fabricating charges against these individuals solely for standing up for their rights.
Miller indicated in a statement that Mayes’ actions are not about justice but about power, aimed at intimidating conservatives and rewriting legal standards.
Drawing attention to the validity of election challenges, Miller highlighted Mayes’ own admission during a leaked phone call that the 2020 election was “challengeable.” This assertion aligns with discoveries that Arizona failed to verify voter citizenship for two decades, raising legitimate concerns about election integrity.
The County Attorney supported indicted figures like former Arizona GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward, asserting they acted lawfully as electors.
He stated, “If you wage a political war against innocent citizens, you should be held accountable—not taxpayers.” This reflects a growing frustration among conservatives who feel they are being targeted by legal actions that lack substantive grounds.
Miller chastised Mayes’ prior career as a regulator, suggesting her inexperience as a prosecutor is evident in her handling of the ongoing case. He accused her of continuing this politicized quest despite overwhelming evidence that undermines the prosecution's legitimacy.
“This pardon stops the weaponization of prosecutions,” Miller declared, arguing that the rights of citizens should not be silenced due to their political beliefs.
As he navigates this contentious landscape, Miller is calling for accountability, warning that the weaponization of the legal system could set a dangerous precedent for future elections and democratic processes.
The case represents a broader battle between political ideologies, as conservatives rally around the significance of lawful election participation, contrary to what they contend are misguided attempts by left-leaning officials to stifle dissent.
With a focus on the rights of individuals and the integrity of the electoral process, Miller's stance may resonate strongly with those advocating for justice and fairness in the political arena.
Sources:
conservativebrief.com
thegatewaypundit.com
mediaite.com
Latest News