Trump's Beef Plan Threatens American Ranchers' Livelihoods
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 5 hours ago
**Fatal Blow to American Ranchers: Trump's Argentine Beef Import Plan**
In a startling announcement that has raised eyebrows and incited outrage among American ranchers, President Donald Trump revealed plans to import beef from Argentina in a bid to lower prices for U.S. consumers.
While the President is lauded for his consumer-friendly intentions, the implications for American ranchers could be dire.
As independent rancher James Burke from Oregon put it, “the independent rancher is always dead freakin last.”
Trump’s assertion that there’s a need to lower beef prices comes amid a surge in consumer demand and a robust market for American producers.
Ranchers across the country are enjoying a period of financial stability thanks to trends like rising beef consumption, which has recently hit a 40-year peak.
Amanda Radke, a South Dakota rancher and agricultural writer, emphasized that what producers truly need is “free and fair markets,” not government intervention that picks winners and losers.
The current state of the beef market has seen ranchers finally making a profit after enduring years of economic hardship.
The concerns grow deeper when we reflect on past governmental missteps.
Historically, interventions have often led to profound damage in the cattle industry.
In the 1960s and 70s, federal price controls under presidents like Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon nearly decimated the sector, leaving long-lasting scars.
Agricultural experts warn that Trump's plan to flood the market with imported beef could once again jeopardize the livelihoods of ranchers who have fought hard to reclaim their footing.
John Rodgers, co-founder of Western Video Market, articulated this fear succinctly, noting the historical precedents of federal actions leading to market devastation.
He cautioned, “If the president is responsible for costs at the grocery store, the natural dynamics of supply and demand must be upended for political strategy.”
Ranchers argue that rather than seeking foreign beef imports, the White House should focus on fair market practices that help domestic producers compete.
Brent Krause, a South Dakota producer, reiterated this viewpoint, insisting that ranchers are often overlooked when decisions that could impact their livelihoods are made.
The community has expressed a strong preference for mandatory country of origin labeling (MCOOL) to ensure that consumers can identify and choose American-raised beef over its foreign counterparts.
Such transparency would empower ranchers and give them a fighting chance against the onslaught of imports, which have been gradually rising.
Currently, imports account for over 22 percent of U.S. beef consumption—more than double what it was in the 1980s.
As ranchers digest the implications of the proposed Argentine beef import plan, many express fear that they may lose faith in a president who has historically been viewed as an ally to rural America.
The void left by struggling American ranchers could ultimately lead to substantial changes in their support for the administration, as Burke pointedly warned, “Quite a few plywood Trump signs in flyover country might get turned over.”
As the Trump administration navigates this precarious balance between consumer prices and domestic agricultural stability, ranchers urge for policies that protect and promote America first—not just in name, but in practice.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
theepochtimes.com
lifenews.com
In a startling announcement that has raised eyebrows and incited outrage among American ranchers, President Donald Trump revealed plans to import beef from Argentina in a bid to lower prices for U.S. consumers.
While the President is lauded for his consumer-friendly intentions, the implications for American ranchers could be dire.
As independent rancher James Burke from Oregon put it, “the independent rancher is always dead freakin last.”
Trump’s assertion that there’s a need to lower beef prices comes amid a surge in consumer demand and a robust market for American producers.
Ranchers across the country are enjoying a period of financial stability thanks to trends like rising beef consumption, which has recently hit a 40-year peak.
Amanda Radke, a South Dakota rancher and agricultural writer, emphasized that what producers truly need is “free and fair markets,” not government intervention that picks winners and losers.
The current state of the beef market has seen ranchers finally making a profit after enduring years of economic hardship.
The concerns grow deeper when we reflect on past governmental missteps.
Historically, interventions have often led to profound damage in the cattle industry.
In the 1960s and 70s, federal price controls under presidents like Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon nearly decimated the sector, leaving long-lasting scars.
Agricultural experts warn that Trump's plan to flood the market with imported beef could once again jeopardize the livelihoods of ranchers who have fought hard to reclaim their footing.
John Rodgers, co-founder of Western Video Market, articulated this fear succinctly, noting the historical precedents of federal actions leading to market devastation.
He cautioned, “If the president is responsible for costs at the grocery store, the natural dynamics of supply and demand must be upended for political strategy.”
Ranchers argue that rather than seeking foreign beef imports, the White House should focus on fair market practices that help domestic producers compete.
Brent Krause, a South Dakota producer, reiterated this viewpoint, insisting that ranchers are often overlooked when decisions that could impact their livelihoods are made.
The community has expressed a strong preference for mandatory country of origin labeling (MCOOL) to ensure that consumers can identify and choose American-raised beef over its foreign counterparts.
Such transparency would empower ranchers and give them a fighting chance against the onslaught of imports, which have been gradually rising.
Currently, imports account for over 22 percent of U.S. beef consumption—more than double what it was in the 1980s.
As ranchers digest the implications of the proposed Argentine beef import plan, many express fear that they may lose faith in a president who has historically been viewed as an ally to rural America.
The void left by struggling American ranchers could ultimately lead to substantial changes in their support for the administration, as Burke pointedly warned, “Quite a few plywood Trump signs in flyover country might get turned over.”
As the Trump administration navigates this precarious balance between consumer prices and domestic agricultural stability, ranchers urge for policies that protect and promote America first—not just in name, but in practice.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
theepochtimes.com
lifenews.com
Latest News