Brennan Faces Criminal Referral for Misleading Congress
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 3 hours ago
Former CIA Director John Brennan is in hot water after the House Judiciary Committee has referred him to the Justice Department for potential criminal prosecution.
This significant development comes as Chairman Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, asserts that Brennan knowingly made false statements during his testimony to Congress regarding his involvement with the discredited Steele dossier.
The referral outlines serious allegations that Brennan misled Congress about the role the CIA played in compiling the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) after the 2016 election.
According to Chairman Jordan, Brennan denied that the CIA had any role in the drafting of the ICA, which claimed that Russia had a preference for Donald Trump and sought to aid his campaign.
This assessment has since been discredited, particularly as it was based in part on the problematic Steele dossier—an opposition research document created through funding from the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC.
Documents recently declassified reveal that not only did the CIA partake in the incorporation of the dossier into the ICA, but Brennan even overrode objections from senior officials within his agency who advised against its inclusion due to its lack of substantiation.
Jordan emphasized that Brennan's repeated assertions contradict established facts, painting a clear picture of intentional deception aimed at misinforming Congress—a direct affront to the integrity of governmental oversight duties.
"Brennan's testimony was not just erroneous; it was a brazen attempt to mislead," stated Jordan during a press briefing.
Jordan further indicated that this referral was not an isolated incident, spotlighting a pattern of misleading statements from Brennan over the years. He cited a previous instance from 2017, when Brennan falsely claimed that the dossier "was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community assessment."
The recent referral underscores a pivotal moment in ongoing discussions about accountability in the federal government, especially in the context of the so-called Russia collusion narrative that has dominated political discourse for years.
As the Justice Department now considers these referrals, many are looking to see how this development might shape future discussions surrounding the misuse of intelligence and the responsibilities of those in high office.
The course of action taken against Brennan stands as a testament to the commitment from Republican lawmakers to uphold the rule of law and ensure accountability among individuals who wield significant power within federal agencies.
As the investigations unfold, the implications for accountability in government practices are profound, and this case could set a significant precedent for the future.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
tmz.com
judiciary.house.gov
This significant development comes as Chairman Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, asserts that Brennan knowingly made false statements during his testimony to Congress regarding his involvement with the discredited Steele dossier.
The referral outlines serious allegations that Brennan misled Congress about the role the CIA played in compiling the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) after the 2016 election.
According to Chairman Jordan, Brennan denied that the CIA had any role in the drafting of the ICA, which claimed that Russia had a preference for Donald Trump and sought to aid his campaign.
This assessment has since been discredited, particularly as it was based in part on the problematic Steele dossier—an opposition research document created through funding from the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC.
Documents recently declassified reveal that not only did the CIA partake in the incorporation of the dossier into the ICA, but Brennan even overrode objections from senior officials within his agency who advised against its inclusion due to its lack of substantiation.
Jordan emphasized that Brennan's repeated assertions contradict established facts, painting a clear picture of intentional deception aimed at misinforming Congress—a direct affront to the integrity of governmental oversight duties.
"Brennan's testimony was not just erroneous; it was a brazen attempt to mislead," stated Jordan during a press briefing.
Jordan further indicated that this referral was not an isolated incident, spotlighting a pattern of misleading statements from Brennan over the years. He cited a previous instance from 2017, when Brennan falsely claimed that the dossier "was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community assessment."
The recent referral underscores a pivotal moment in ongoing discussions about accountability in the federal government, especially in the context of the so-called Russia collusion narrative that has dominated political discourse for years.
As the Justice Department now considers these referrals, many are looking to see how this development might shape future discussions surrounding the misuse of intelligence and the responsibilities of those in high office.
The course of action taken against Brennan stands as a testament to the commitment from Republican lawmakers to uphold the rule of law and ensure accountability among individuals who wield significant power within federal agencies.
As the investigations unfold, the implications for accountability in government practices are profound, and this case could set a significant precedent for the future.
Sources:
thefederalist.com
tmz.com
judiciary.house.gov
Latest News