WHO's Cellphone Radiation Safety Claims Under Serious Scrutiny
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 7 hours ago
A bombshell report from a coalition of scientists is raising serious questions about the safety assessments from the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding cellphone radiation, challenging conventional narratives that have long been accepted by global health authorities.
The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) has accused the WHO of employing flawed methodologies that downplay critical health risks associated with cellphone usage, including potential links to cancer and decreased fertility.
In the report, the ICBE-EMF argues that the WHO’s systematic reviews suffered from significant methodological issues, primarily due to improper application of meta-analysis techniques. This questionable approach obscures potential evidence of harm by averaging results from studies that differ significantly in their exposure conditions and quality.
This oversight raises alarming concerns for the public, especially since the WHO’s conclusions will influence safety standards and regulatory policies globally.
Instead of substantiating its position with rigorous analyses, the WHO relied on an outdated “thermal-only paradigm,” which incorrectly maintains that non-ionizing radiation from cellphones poses no risk unless it generates heat. This stance contradicts a growing body of research indicating that biological harm may occur even at low, non-thermal levels of exposure.
The ICBE-EMF's own findings revealed that the WHO’s reviews confirmed links between radiofrequency (RF) radiation and specific types of cancer in animals, such as malignant gliomas and schwannomas, as well as issues related to male fertility. However, these alarming conclusions seem to have been glossed over, likely due to perceived industry biases among the WHO review authors.
As skepticism of mainstream health organizations rises, it is crucial for the public to demand transparency and accountability from institutions like the WHO, particularly when it comes to interpreting research that directly impacts our health and safety.
This comprehensive critique from independent scientists suggests a need for a reevaluation of WHO guidelines on radiation safety. It calls for a more precautionary approach that puts the onus on the telecom industry to prove the safety of its products, especially for more susceptible groups such as children and pregnant women.
In an era marked by a heightened awareness of personal health and safety, Americans must remain vigilant against potential health risks that may arise from ubiquitous technology. Mobilizing voices in favor of a thorough and unbiased reassessment could lead to significant changes in public policy that align with the principles of informed consent and precaution in health risk management.
Sources:
basedunderground.com
naturalnews.com
jalopnik.com
The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) has accused the WHO of employing flawed methodologies that downplay critical health risks associated with cellphone usage, including potential links to cancer and decreased fertility.
In the report, the ICBE-EMF argues that the WHO’s systematic reviews suffered from significant methodological issues, primarily due to improper application of meta-analysis techniques. This questionable approach obscures potential evidence of harm by averaging results from studies that differ significantly in their exposure conditions and quality.
This oversight raises alarming concerns for the public, especially since the WHO’s conclusions will influence safety standards and regulatory policies globally.
Instead of substantiating its position with rigorous analyses, the WHO relied on an outdated “thermal-only paradigm,” which incorrectly maintains that non-ionizing radiation from cellphones poses no risk unless it generates heat. This stance contradicts a growing body of research indicating that biological harm may occur even at low, non-thermal levels of exposure.
The ICBE-EMF's own findings revealed that the WHO’s reviews confirmed links between radiofrequency (RF) radiation and specific types of cancer in animals, such as malignant gliomas and schwannomas, as well as issues related to male fertility. However, these alarming conclusions seem to have been glossed over, likely due to perceived industry biases among the WHO review authors.
As skepticism of mainstream health organizations rises, it is crucial for the public to demand transparency and accountability from institutions like the WHO, particularly when it comes to interpreting research that directly impacts our health and safety.
This comprehensive critique from independent scientists suggests a need for a reevaluation of WHO guidelines on radiation safety. It calls for a more precautionary approach that puts the onus on the telecom industry to prove the safety of its products, especially for more susceptible groups such as children and pregnant women.
In an era marked by a heightened awareness of personal health and safety, Americans must remain vigilant against potential health risks that may arise from ubiquitous technology. Mobilizing voices in favor of a thorough and unbiased reassessment could lead to significant changes in public policy that align with the principles of informed consent and precaution in health risk management.
Sources:
basedunderground.com
naturalnews.com
jalopnik.com
Latest News