FBI Manipulation? New Evidence on January 6 Bombing
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 9 hours ago
**Evidence Grows That Jan. 6 Bombing Incident Was Manipulated by Authorities**
In an explosive development that calls into question the narrative surrounding the January 6 incident, a meticulous video analysis suggests the FBI may have altered key evidence related to the planting of pipe bombs.
A video engineer known as Armitas has spent over a year piecing together the events surrounding the pipe bombs found near the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters and the Capitol Hill Club.
His findings culminated in a comprehensive 26-page report submitted to Congress, tackling inconsistencies in the official FBI narrative.
Armitas contends that the video footage released by the FBI was digitally manipulated, claiming vital evidence was cropped and frame rates reduced to make identification of the suspect more difficult.
Perhaps most eye-opening is his assertion that the evidence points to a scenario where the bombs were planted the day before the January 6 chaos—specifically on January 5—and later retrieved, only to be repositioned for so-called discovery on January 6.
The original claim of an anonymous suspect, described as a 5'7” individual wearing a grey hoodie, had led to intense speculation and heightened national security concerns.
Armitas’s report scrutinizes how the bomb found at the DNC was allegedly retrieved and reinstalled just before its "discovery" during a critical moment, implying possible coordination with law enforcement personnel.
Concerns were raised about the timing of the bomb's alleged placement, particularly given that it was found close to the arrival of Capitol Police and Secret Service teams for Vice President-elect Kamala Harris.
Despite extensive FBI involvement and a reward of $500,000 for information, no arrests have been made regarding the pipe bomb incident, raising eyebrows about the FBI's methods and motivations.
The public is beginning to take notice as Armitas's findings fuel speculation about whether the events of January 6 were understood differently than presented by the federal authorities.
As more questions arise about the FBI's credibility, this incident could serve as a pivotal moment that shifts the narrative around January 6.
While many Americans were led to believe that the incident was purely the result of grassroots disturbance, emerging evidence now suggests a more complex situation, pointing to the possibility of underhanded tactics at play.
The implications of this analysis may reverberate through ongoing discussions about accountability, oversight of federal agencies, and the very fabric of our democratic processes.
As citizens, it is our duty to remain vigilant and critically evaluate the information presented to us, particularly when those in power may have motivations shrouded in secrecy.
Sources:
theblaze.com
breitbart.com
dailycaller.com
In an explosive development that calls into question the narrative surrounding the January 6 incident, a meticulous video analysis suggests the FBI may have altered key evidence related to the planting of pipe bombs.
A video engineer known as Armitas has spent over a year piecing together the events surrounding the pipe bombs found near the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters and the Capitol Hill Club.
His findings culminated in a comprehensive 26-page report submitted to Congress, tackling inconsistencies in the official FBI narrative.
Armitas contends that the video footage released by the FBI was digitally manipulated, claiming vital evidence was cropped and frame rates reduced to make identification of the suspect more difficult.
Perhaps most eye-opening is his assertion that the evidence points to a scenario where the bombs were planted the day before the January 6 chaos—specifically on January 5—and later retrieved, only to be repositioned for so-called discovery on January 6.
The original claim of an anonymous suspect, described as a 5'7” individual wearing a grey hoodie, had led to intense speculation and heightened national security concerns.
Armitas’s report scrutinizes how the bomb found at the DNC was allegedly retrieved and reinstalled just before its "discovery" during a critical moment, implying possible coordination with law enforcement personnel.
Concerns were raised about the timing of the bomb's alleged placement, particularly given that it was found close to the arrival of Capitol Police and Secret Service teams for Vice President-elect Kamala Harris.
Despite extensive FBI involvement and a reward of $500,000 for information, no arrests have been made regarding the pipe bomb incident, raising eyebrows about the FBI's methods and motivations.
The public is beginning to take notice as Armitas's findings fuel speculation about whether the events of January 6 were understood differently than presented by the federal authorities.
As more questions arise about the FBI's credibility, this incident could serve as a pivotal moment that shifts the narrative around January 6.
While many Americans were led to believe that the incident was purely the result of grassroots disturbance, emerging evidence now suggests a more complex situation, pointing to the possibility of underhanded tactics at play.
The implications of this analysis may reverberate through ongoing discussions about accountability, oversight of federal agencies, and the very fabric of our democratic processes.
As citizens, it is our duty to remain vigilant and critically evaluate the information presented to us, particularly when those in power may have motivations shrouded in secrecy.
Sources:
theblaze.com
breitbart.com
dailycaller.com
Latest News