CDC's Shocking Vaccine Testimony Challenges Acceptable Narrative
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Shocking CDC Testimony Reveals Covid Vaccines May Have Caused Greater Harm Than Benefit**
In a groundbreaking Senate testimony, Dr. Toby Rogers unveiled alarming statistics from the CDC regarding the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine, raising questions about the safety and efficacy of the shots that were aggressively promoted by officials.
The testimony has ignited a firestorm of debate, particularly as mainstream narratives continue to tout the vaccines as "safe and effective."
Dr. Rogers, a prominent researcher with the Brownstone Institute, asserted that CDC data indicates these vaccines may actually possess "negative efficacy," meaning they could have done more harm than good.
This revelation goes against the grain of the prevailing perspective touted throughout the pandemic, where the urgency to vaccinate the population often overshadowed concerns about potential side effects.
Applause erupted in the hearing as Dr. Rogers posed the critical question: “Tell me how a vaccine with negative efficacy is saving lives?”
Highlighting his extensive research on the potential links between childhood vaccines and autism, he pointed to gaps within the CDC's own literature that contradict their assertions.
For years, the government has dismissed any vaccine-related links to autism, yet Dr. Rogers revealed that studies lacking unvaccinated control groups cannot effectively confirm the safety of current vaccines.
Alarmingly, he explained that six published studies, which did compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children, found an increased risk of autism in those who received vaccinations.
Dr. Rogers also discussed the urgent need for action, pointing out that autism has emerged as a crisis affecting millions of American children, costing the nation “hundreds of billions of dollars.”
The call for transparency and accountability is clear, resonating with many parents who have witnessed the troubling trends in childhood health firsthand.
He stressed, “The best available evidence suggests that anything that causes an immune activation event — an infectious disease, an industrial toxicant, or a vaccine — can cause autism.”
The political implications of this testimony could be significant, potentially reshaping the narrative around public health interventions that have dominated the past few years.
As more Americans seek the truth about their health and safety, it’s critical to ask: If the vaccines were purported to protect us, why does the evidence seem to suggest otherwise?
Dr. Rogers’ testimony not only raises questions about public health policy but could also empower those who advocate for parental rights in medical decisions.
As conservatives and citizens alike reflect on these shocking findings, one thing is certain: the call for a re-evaluation of government health mandates is louder than ever.
Sources:
bbc.com
slaynews.com
frontpagemag.com
In a groundbreaking Senate testimony, Dr. Toby Rogers unveiled alarming statistics from the CDC regarding the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine, raising questions about the safety and efficacy of the shots that were aggressively promoted by officials.
The testimony has ignited a firestorm of debate, particularly as mainstream narratives continue to tout the vaccines as "safe and effective."
Dr. Rogers, a prominent researcher with the Brownstone Institute, asserted that CDC data indicates these vaccines may actually possess "negative efficacy," meaning they could have done more harm than good.
This revelation goes against the grain of the prevailing perspective touted throughout the pandemic, where the urgency to vaccinate the population often overshadowed concerns about potential side effects.
Applause erupted in the hearing as Dr. Rogers posed the critical question: “Tell me how a vaccine with negative efficacy is saving lives?”
Highlighting his extensive research on the potential links between childhood vaccines and autism, he pointed to gaps within the CDC's own literature that contradict their assertions.
For years, the government has dismissed any vaccine-related links to autism, yet Dr. Rogers revealed that studies lacking unvaccinated control groups cannot effectively confirm the safety of current vaccines.
Alarmingly, he explained that six published studies, which did compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children, found an increased risk of autism in those who received vaccinations.
Dr. Rogers also discussed the urgent need for action, pointing out that autism has emerged as a crisis affecting millions of American children, costing the nation “hundreds of billions of dollars.”
The call for transparency and accountability is clear, resonating with many parents who have witnessed the troubling trends in childhood health firsthand.
He stressed, “The best available evidence suggests that anything that causes an immune activation event — an infectious disease, an industrial toxicant, or a vaccine — can cause autism.”
The political implications of this testimony could be significant, potentially reshaping the narrative around public health interventions that have dominated the past few years.
As more Americans seek the truth about their health and safety, it’s critical to ask: If the vaccines were purported to protect us, why does the evidence seem to suggest otherwise?
Dr. Rogers’ testimony not only raises questions about public health policy but could also empower those who advocate for parental rights in medical decisions.
As conservatives and citizens alike reflect on these shocking findings, one thing is certain: the call for a re-evaluation of government health mandates is louder than ever.
Sources:
bbc.com
slaynews.com
frontpagemag.com
Latest News