NYC DA's Disregard for Justice Exposes Political Bias
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 12 hours ago
**Shocking Injustice: NYC DA Drops Assault Charges in Political Violence Case**
In a glaring demonstration of political bias within the judicial system, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has dropped all charges against a woman who violently attacked a pro-life advocate.
This incident, which was captured on video, involved Craven Antao questioning a woman identified as Pine Rivers about her views on abortion. Despite Antao remaining non-threatening and merely persistent, Rivers responded with physical aggression, leaving Antao requiring emergency medical treatment and incurring significant medical expenses.
Bragg's office initially acknowledged the severity of the situation by arresting Rivers on a second-degree assault charge. However, following a troubling pattern of leniency towards violent offenders, the charges were downgraded to a misdemeanor and eventually dismissed altogether.
Critically, this decision not only raises questions about Bragg’s commitment to upholding the law but also underscores a broader trend in which political violence seems to receive leniency when it aligns with progressive agendas.
Had the roles been reversed, and a pro-life advocate had committed a similar act against a pro-choice individual, it is almost certain that Bragg would have pursued the case with full vigor, seeking to set an example and demonstrate that such violence is intolerable. The lack of similar energy in prosecuting political violence from the left is a troubling indication of bias that undermines the credibility of the justice system.
Furthermore, this incident fits within a disturbing narrative where accountability for violent actions appears to hinge on political affiliation. We’ve witnessed another example of this double standard with the treatment of individuals involved in rioting and destruction in cities across America, where charges are often dropped or dramatically reduced.
This development is not only disheartening for those who advocate for law and order but also reflects a troubling disregard for the safety of those who express differing political views. As a nation, we must demand that political violence is addressed unequivocally, regardless of the perpetrator's beliefs.
As outrage builds over Bragg’s decision, it remains crucial for voters to hold their leaders accountable and ensure that the rule of law applies equally to all citizens—regardless of their political stance. The message sent by Bragg's office could embolden similar acts of aggression and further polarize an already divided society, as those on the left appear to be shielded from the consequences of their actions.
Sources:
jonathanturley.org
dailycaller.com
cbssports.com
In a glaring demonstration of political bias within the judicial system, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has dropped all charges against a woman who violently attacked a pro-life advocate.
This incident, which was captured on video, involved Craven Antao questioning a woman identified as Pine Rivers about her views on abortion. Despite Antao remaining non-threatening and merely persistent, Rivers responded with physical aggression, leaving Antao requiring emergency medical treatment and incurring significant medical expenses.
Bragg's office initially acknowledged the severity of the situation by arresting Rivers on a second-degree assault charge. However, following a troubling pattern of leniency towards violent offenders, the charges were downgraded to a misdemeanor and eventually dismissed altogether.
Critically, this decision not only raises questions about Bragg’s commitment to upholding the law but also underscores a broader trend in which political violence seems to receive leniency when it aligns with progressive agendas.
Had the roles been reversed, and a pro-life advocate had committed a similar act against a pro-choice individual, it is almost certain that Bragg would have pursued the case with full vigor, seeking to set an example and demonstrate that such violence is intolerable. The lack of similar energy in prosecuting political violence from the left is a troubling indication of bias that undermines the credibility of the justice system.
Furthermore, this incident fits within a disturbing narrative where accountability for violent actions appears to hinge on political affiliation. We’ve witnessed another example of this double standard with the treatment of individuals involved in rioting and destruction in cities across America, where charges are often dropped or dramatically reduced.
This development is not only disheartening for those who advocate for law and order but also reflects a troubling disregard for the safety of those who express differing political views. As a nation, we must demand that political violence is addressed unequivocally, regardless of the perpetrator's beliefs.
As outrage builds over Bragg’s decision, it remains crucial for voters to hold their leaders accountable and ensure that the rule of law applies equally to all citizens—regardless of their political stance. The message sent by Bragg's office could embolden similar acts of aggression and further polarize an already divided society, as those on the left appear to be shielded from the consequences of their actions.
Sources:
jonathanturley.org
dailycaller.com
cbssports.com
Latest News