Oregon Bill Dangerous Expansion for Assisted Suicide Practices
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Disturbing Trend: Oregon's Bill to Allow Assisted Suicide by Non-Physicians**
A proposed bill in Oregon is raising significant concerns as it seeks to expand access to assisted suicide by allowing non-physician practitioners to participate in this controversial practice.
Senate Bill 1003 aims to redefine the roles in assisted suicide, replacing the term "attending physician" with "prescribing provider." This would enable physician assistants and nurse practitioners to prescribe lethal medication, marking a troubling first in the United States.
Critics argue that this legislative move significantly lowers the standard of care, risking lives in a bid to increase accessibility to assisted suicide. As Wesley J. Smith of National Review pointedly asked, "Would you trust a PA or NP to diagnose me with six months to live?"
This bill mirrors trends seen in Canada, where a sharp increase in assisted suicide rates has occurred. In Canada, approximately 4.7% of deaths are attributed to practitioner-assisted deaths, compared to a mere 0.3% in California for similar procedures. The push for such measures in the U.S. raises alarms about the quality of medical care and ethical boundaries in end-of-life decisions.
Oregon Right to Life's executive director, Lois Anderson, strongly opposes the bill, stating, "This bill is dangerous and must be stopped." She emphasized the need for compassionate, high-quality palliative care rather than expanded access to assisted suicide, urging legislators to reconsider their priorities.
The chilling implications of this proposal extend beyond state lines, as its advocates push for similar measures in other states like Vermont. Some experts argue that the real issue behind these expansion efforts is a lack of physicians willing to engage in assisted suicide, forcing advocates to enlist less trained personnel to fulfill their demands.
As the debate unfolds, it's increasingly clear that the introduction of non-physicians into assisted suicide procedures poses a moral and medical dilemma.
The discussion around this bill serves as a critical reminder of the need for vigilance in maintaining the sanctity of life, ensuring that healthcare remains a healing profession rather than one that can so easily facilitate death.
Michigan and Ohio may see similar battles ahead; as other states consider similar legislation, conservatives must remain steadfast in defending human life and upholding compassionate care in healthcare practices across the nation.
Sources:
liveaction.org
cnbc.com
yahoo.com
A proposed bill in Oregon is raising significant concerns as it seeks to expand access to assisted suicide by allowing non-physician practitioners to participate in this controversial practice.
Senate Bill 1003 aims to redefine the roles in assisted suicide, replacing the term "attending physician" with "prescribing provider." This would enable physician assistants and nurse practitioners to prescribe lethal medication, marking a troubling first in the United States.
Critics argue that this legislative move significantly lowers the standard of care, risking lives in a bid to increase accessibility to assisted suicide. As Wesley J. Smith of National Review pointedly asked, "Would you trust a PA or NP to diagnose me with six months to live?"
This bill mirrors trends seen in Canada, where a sharp increase in assisted suicide rates has occurred. In Canada, approximately 4.7% of deaths are attributed to practitioner-assisted deaths, compared to a mere 0.3% in California for similar procedures. The push for such measures in the U.S. raises alarms about the quality of medical care and ethical boundaries in end-of-life decisions.
Oregon Right to Life's executive director, Lois Anderson, strongly opposes the bill, stating, "This bill is dangerous and must be stopped." She emphasized the need for compassionate, high-quality palliative care rather than expanded access to assisted suicide, urging legislators to reconsider their priorities.
The chilling implications of this proposal extend beyond state lines, as its advocates push for similar measures in other states like Vermont. Some experts argue that the real issue behind these expansion efforts is a lack of physicians willing to engage in assisted suicide, forcing advocates to enlist less trained personnel to fulfill their demands.
As the debate unfolds, it's increasingly clear that the introduction of non-physicians into assisted suicide procedures poses a moral and medical dilemma.
The discussion around this bill serves as a critical reminder of the need for vigilance in maintaining the sanctity of life, ensuring that healthcare remains a healing profession rather than one that can so easily facilitate death.
Michigan and Ohio may see similar battles ahead; as other states consider similar legislation, conservatives must remain steadfast in defending human life and upholding compassionate care in healthcare practices across the nation.
Sources:
liveaction.org
cnbc.com
yahoo.com
Latest News