Hegseth Slams Activist Judge Over Military Policy Disruption
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 10 days ago
**Activist Judge Tries to Undermine Military Policy, Draws Fire from Hegseth**
In a bold move against a controversial ruling, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has staunchly criticized US District Judge Ana Reyes for her attempts to overturn President Trump's military transgender ban.
Appointed during the Biden administration, Judge Reyes declared that Trump's Executive Order, which sought to restrict transgender individuals from serving in the military, violated the Constitution's equal protection clause.
Hegseth, known for his unwavering support of military integrity, took to social media to lampoon Reyes, dubbing her "Commander Reyes" and sarcastically suggesting she take on active military duties.
He commented, "Since ‘Judge’ Reyes is now a top military planner, she can report to Fort Benning at 0600 to instruct our Army Rangers on how to execute High Value Target Raids."
The Department of Defense's original directive, issued earlier this year, aligns with the goal of upholding military readiness and discipline by allowing the expulsion of serving transgender personnel and prohibiting their enlistment.
In a legal battle ahead, attorneys for the Trump administration argue that the military retains the right to exclude individuals deemed unfit for service due to various conditions, citing precedents that encompass mental health considerations.
The response from Hegseth reflects a broader concern over the judiciary's encroachment on executive authority, highlighting the ongoing conflict with activist judges attempting to disrupt Trump's agenda.
As the Trump administration continues to face challenges from the left, this legal confrontation underscores the importance of maintaining a military policy that prioritizes operational readiness above social agendas.
Hegseth's resistance is indicative of a wider pushback against liberal judicial activism, which threatens to reshape policies rooted in traditional values and national security priorities.
With the nation watching, the outcome of this legal tussle may very well impact future military recruitment and retention policies, further underlining the stakes involved in maintaining a strong and effective armed forces.
Sources:
infowars.com
wnd.com
espn.com
In a bold move against a controversial ruling, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has staunchly criticized US District Judge Ana Reyes for her attempts to overturn President Trump's military transgender ban.
Appointed during the Biden administration, Judge Reyes declared that Trump's Executive Order, which sought to restrict transgender individuals from serving in the military, violated the Constitution's equal protection clause.
Hegseth, known for his unwavering support of military integrity, took to social media to lampoon Reyes, dubbing her "Commander Reyes" and sarcastically suggesting she take on active military duties.
He commented, "Since ‘Judge’ Reyes is now a top military planner, she can report to Fort Benning at 0600 to instruct our Army Rangers on how to execute High Value Target Raids."
The Department of Defense's original directive, issued earlier this year, aligns with the goal of upholding military readiness and discipline by allowing the expulsion of serving transgender personnel and prohibiting their enlistment.
In a legal battle ahead, attorneys for the Trump administration argue that the military retains the right to exclude individuals deemed unfit for service due to various conditions, citing precedents that encompass mental health considerations.
The response from Hegseth reflects a broader concern over the judiciary's encroachment on executive authority, highlighting the ongoing conflict with activist judges attempting to disrupt Trump's agenda.
As the Trump administration continues to face challenges from the left, this legal confrontation underscores the importance of maintaining a military policy that prioritizes operational readiness above social agendas.
Hegseth's resistance is indicative of a wider pushback against liberal judicial activism, which threatens to reshape policies rooted in traditional values and national security priorities.
With the nation watching, the outcome of this legal tussle may very well impact future military recruitment and retention policies, further underlining the stakes involved in maintaining a strong and effective armed forces.
Sources:
infowars.com
wnd.com
espn.com
Latest News