Climate Program Exposed: Partisan Bias and Profiteering Unveiled
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 4 hours ago
Greed.
The shameful reality of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, a government initiative founded over thirty years ago, is being unearthed, exposing a web of financial ties and partisan bias in climate science.
Contrary to its supposed mission of guiding informed decision-making on climate issues, this program has become a lucrative arm of the federal government, funneling billions into the hands of politically aligned contractors.
As it stands, the program is projected to have a whopping budget of $4.95 billion in 2025, but astonishingly, it lists only two full-time employees on its staff. The bulk of the work appears to be outsourced to a government contractor named ICF, which is poised to receive millions to contribute to the National Climate Assessment reports.
These reports, crucial in shaping climate policy across the country, have increasingly shown a clear liberal bias, relying heavily on studies and narratives forged by a company stacked with Democrat donors.
With two of the program's key personnel displaying blatant partisan tendencies—one having supported both Biden and Harris in their presidential campaigns—it raises serious questions about the objectivity of the data being presented to Congress and state governments alike.
Former officials from the Trump administration, including Russell Vought, have pushed for greater oversight and scrutiny of the contractors involved in producing these assessments. Their work, it seems, is not simply academic but carries significant political weight, dictating funding decisions and regulatory actions across the United States.
Critics of the program point out that the contracts awarded to ICF and others within the climate science sphere look more like a system of political patronage than a legitimate effort to address climate change.
ICF has come under fire not only for its political leanings but also for taking in staggering amounts from government contracts—over $2 billion during the Biden administration alone—prompting calls for a transparent evaluation of its alignment with taxpayer interests.
The fact that a partisan firm can dominate the narrative on such a crucial national issue demonstrates a troubling trend: the intertwining of government funding with partisan agendas.
The public deserves to know the truth about climate science, free from the cloud of financial entanglements and partisan motivations. The future of climate policy should not be left in the hands of a political elite, but rather guided by objective assessments that truly represent the scientific community at large.
It's more vital than ever to hold these institutions accountable to ensure that the American people receive honest and fair evaluations that reflect the complexities of our environment—without the heavy hand of partisanship skewing the facts.
Sources:
dailywire.com
thesurvivalmom.com
pjmedia.com
The shameful reality of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, a government initiative founded over thirty years ago, is being unearthed, exposing a web of financial ties and partisan bias in climate science.
Contrary to its supposed mission of guiding informed decision-making on climate issues, this program has become a lucrative arm of the federal government, funneling billions into the hands of politically aligned contractors.
As it stands, the program is projected to have a whopping budget of $4.95 billion in 2025, but astonishingly, it lists only two full-time employees on its staff. The bulk of the work appears to be outsourced to a government contractor named ICF, which is poised to receive millions to contribute to the National Climate Assessment reports.
These reports, crucial in shaping climate policy across the country, have increasingly shown a clear liberal bias, relying heavily on studies and narratives forged by a company stacked with Democrat donors.
With two of the program's key personnel displaying blatant partisan tendencies—one having supported both Biden and Harris in their presidential campaigns—it raises serious questions about the objectivity of the data being presented to Congress and state governments alike.
Former officials from the Trump administration, including Russell Vought, have pushed for greater oversight and scrutiny of the contractors involved in producing these assessments. Their work, it seems, is not simply academic but carries significant political weight, dictating funding decisions and regulatory actions across the United States.
Critics of the program point out that the contracts awarded to ICF and others within the climate science sphere look more like a system of political patronage than a legitimate effort to address climate change.
ICF has come under fire not only for its political leanings but also for taking in staggering amounts from government contracts—over $2 billion during the Biden administration alone—prompting calls for a transparent evaluation of its alignment with taxpayer interests.
The fact that a partisan firm can dominate the narrative on such a crucial national issue demonstrates a troubling trend: the intertwining of government funding with partisan agendas.
The public deserves to know the truth about climate science, free from the cloud of financial entanglements and partisan motivations. The future of climate policy should not be left in the hands of a political elite, but rather guided by objective assessments that truly represent the scientific community at large.
It's more vital than ever to hold these institutions accountable to ensure that the American people receive honest and fair evaluations that reflect the complexities of our environment—without the heavy hand of partisanship skewing the facts.
Sources:
dailywire.com
thesurvivalmom.com
pjmedia.com
Latest News