FBI Acknowledged WaPo's Russiagate Story Was False
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 6 hours ago
**Bombshell Revelations: FBI Knew WaPo's Russiagate Story Was False**
In an astonishing turn of events, newly declassified documents have surfaced revealing that the FBI was aware that the Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post story regarding Russiagate was false.
This revelation is a significant vindication for former President Donald Trump, who has long asserted that the Russiagate narrative was a politically motivated smear campaign against him.
The documents, derived from interviews conducted by the Mueller team, indicate that the former National Security Agency director, Michael Rogers, contradicted the portrayal of Trump in the Washington Post article.
In a stunning acknowledgment, Rogers stated that rather than urging Rogers to publicly deny the existence of evidence of collusion, Trump merely inquired about signals intelligence evidence.
Such confusion highlights the misleading nature of the mainstream media's portrayal during this tumultuous period.
Reflecting on these findings, it's clear that the integrity of major media outlets has suffered severely in the wake of aggressive reporting aimed at undermining Trump's presidency.
This isn't just a question of journalistic standards; it raises concerns about accountability and transparency within organizations historically viewed as guardians of truth.
As Trump pursues a defamation lawsuit against the Pulitzer Board, this new evidence adds weight to his claims.
Additionally, it sheds light on the machinations that defined the politically charged environment during the campaign and presidency of the 45th President.
The ramifications of these revelations extend beyond Trump himself; they serve as a reminder of the essential responsibility of the media to uphold its standards and challenge the narratives pushed by partisan interests.
As the dust settles, questions linger regarding how this misinformation was allowed to perpetuate for so long and what mainstream media's role will be moving forward.
The American public deserves a commitment to transparency and honesty from publications that seek to inform them.
It remains to be seen how the Washington Post and others will respond to these claims, but one thing is clear: the truth is finally emerging, and it is a victory for those who have fought against media bias and narrative manipulation.
Sources:
twitchy.com
dnyuz.com
cnbc.com
In an astonishing turn of events, newly declassified documents have surfaced revealing that the FBI was aware that the Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post story regarding Russiagate was false.
This revelation is a significant vindication for former President Donald Trump, who has long asserted that the Russiagate narrative was a politically motivated smear campaign against him.
The documents, derived from interviews conducted by the Mueller team, indicate that the former National Security Agency director, Michael Rogers, contradicted the portrayal of Trump in the Washington Post article.
In a stunning acknowledgment, Rogers stated that rather than urging Rogers to publicly deny the existence of evidence of collusion, Trump merely inquired about signals intelligence evidence.
Such confusion highlights the misleading nature of the mainstream media's portrayal during this tumultuous period.
Reflecting on these findings, it's clear that the integrity of major media outlets has suffered severely in the wake of aggressive reporting aimed at undermining Trump's presidency.
This isn't just a question of journalistic standards; it raises concerns about accountability and transparency within organizations historically viewed as guardians of truth.
As Trump pursues a defamation lawsuit against the Pulitzer Board, this new evidence adds weight to his claims.
Additionally, it sheds light on the machinations that defined the politically charged environment during the campaign and presidency of the 45th President.
The ramifications of these revelations extend beyond Trump himself; they serve as a reminder of the essential responsibility of the media to uphold its standards and challenge the narratives pushed by partisan interests.
As the dust settles, questions linger regarding how this misinformation was allowed to perpetuate for so long and what mainstream media's role will be moving forward.
The American public deserves a commitment to transparency and honesty from publications that seek to inform them.
It remains to be seen how the Washington Post and others will respond to these claims, but one thing is clear: the truth is finally emerging, and it is a victory for those who have fought against media bias and narrative manipulation.
Sources:
twitchy.com
dnyuz.com
cnbc.com
Latest News