The recent revelations surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris’s contingency plans for a potential presidency of her own have raised serious concerns about the stability and transparency of the Biden administration.
A bombshell from journalist Amie Parnes reveals that Harris’s communications team prepared a spreadsheet detailing Republican judges who could be called upon to swear her in, should President Biden's health take a turn for the worse.
This astonishing move indicates a clear lack of confidence in Biden's ability to serve as President—a sentiment that is becoming increasingly apparent among the American public.
Not only does this expose the infighting and backroom dealings among top Democrats, but it also raises constitutional questions regarding the leadership of the country. It was reported that even the Democratic National Committee was involved in this secretive process, further demonstrating the level of paranoia within the party about Biden’s fitness for office.
As these troubling details come to light, many are left to wonder: who is truly guiding the nation?
The purpose of this spreadsheet appears to be far more about political optics than constitutional integrity. Designed to ensure Harris's rise appears legitimate in the eyes of the public, this backdoor maneuvering signifies a dangerous trend in how power is being managed in Washington.
It paints a jarring picture—one that suggests a White House too concerned with image and survival rather than transparency and accountability. This is not merely a failure of the current administration; it represents an alarming shift in the political landscape of the United States.
The American people deserve better than a government that prioritizes strategic optics over the fundamental principles of the Constitution. If the Biden administration is this worried about his cognitive health, isn't it time for a serious discussion about accountability and leadership?
This revelation invites a very real reconsideration of what is at stake for the future of the United States. As citizens reflect on an administration that touted itself as the model of transparency, they must now grapple with stark evidence to the contrary.
In the era of Trump, the question remains: can the American people trust a government that undergoes such elaborate preparations for a succession that, by constitutional rights, should be clear-cut and above board?
Sources:
thepoliticalmovement.comshtfplan.combreitbart.com