**Outrage as Democrats Defend Notorious MS-13 Gang Member**
A controversial situation is unfolding as Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen faces backlash for advocating the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a known MS-13 gang member.
Abrego, who has been described by authorities as “1000%” affiliated with the violent gang, was previously deported under the Alien Enemies Act after two courts confirmed he was in the U.S. illegally and was linked to severe criminal activities, including domestic violence.
While enjoying a cup of coffee with a human rights activist during a visit to El Salvador, Abrego was photographed looking healthy—a fact that hasn’t stopped Senator Van Hollen from pushing for his return to the United States. This move has raised eyebrows and prompted criticism, particularly from local law enforcement.
Maryland Sheriff Tom Langer took to social media to express his dismay, highlighting that Van Hollen's insistence on bringing back a criminal is not only misguided but also a slap in the face to victims of gang violence.
“Why don’t Democrats like Van Hollen care about victims?” Langer questioned.
He noted a stark contrast in priorities—Van Hollen flies to El Salvador to support an accused MS-13 member while ignoring Maryland residents who suffer from gang-related violence.
The issue highlights an ongoing debate about immigration and public safety, particularly how it pertains to individuals with violent criminal histories.
President Trump, during his administration, made significant strides in cracking down on illegal immigration and gang violence, prioritizing the safety of American citizens.
Critics are calling for Van Hollen and his allies to reconsider their stance. They argue that true compassion for victims should take precedence over advocating for those who pose a danger to the community.
With the rise of illegal immigration and gang-related crime, it's crucial that lawmakers prioritize the safety of American families over international relations with criminals.
As this story unfolds, the American public is left to ponder the priorities of their elected officials and the implications of supporting individuals with serious criminal affiliations.
Sources:
independentsentinel.comdailyheadlines.netrumble.com