Justice Requires Equality, Not Racial Preferences in Plea Deals

Submitted by MAGA

Posted 4 hours ago

**Probe Launched into Racial Preferences in Plea Deals: A Step Towards Justice**



Federal investigators are taking action against a controversial policy in a Minnesota prosecutor's office that may be blatantly violating the Constitution by factoring race into plea negotiations.

The Department of Justice (DOJ), under Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon, is now reviewing the practices of Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, who is facing scrutiny for her stance on plea deals.


Moriarty's office suggested in an April memo that prosecutors consider a defendant's race and age when determining plea offers. This memo indicates a troubling trend in which race may play an unacceptable role in judicial processes.

The DOJ's intervention underscores a commitment to civil rights and equitable treatment under the law, a principle that should resonate with all Americans. The DOJ's letter accuses Moriarty’s office of potentially engaging in a pattern of discrimination, emphasizing the need to uphold the Constitution.

By allowing race to influence legal outcomes, Moriarty’s office is effectively introducing a system of racial privilege that undermines the justice system. Legal experts, including Cornell law professor William A. Jacobson, describe this as a dangerous incursion of Critical Race Theory into the justice system, arguing that it is not only unlawful but also deeply offensive.

“We should reject the notion that race should determine the severity of punishment,” Jacobson remarked, urging that the DOJ step in decisively. He represents a growing chorus of voices calling for a return to justice that is blind to race, recognizing that equity should mean treating all individuals the same, regardless of their background.

Moriarty previously came under fire for her leniency towards a state official associated with the Democratic Governor of Minnesota. She allowed an individual who vandalized Tesla vehicles—a direct strike at Elon Musk, who has shown unwavering support for Republican values—to evade felony charges, merely requiring restitution instead.

This light-touch approach to wrongdoing appears to embolden illegal actions and sets a misguided precedent. Critics contend that leniency based on race not only jeopardizes the rule of law but also promotes further criminal behavior under the belief that similar reprisals will be excused.

The investigations by the DOJ and continued scrutiny from conservative legal advocates signal a crucial moment for accountability.

As the Biden administration continues to grapple with policies that appear to favor preferential treatment based on race, it’s critical to recognize that true justice requires impartiality—something many justice advocates argue has been notably absent in recent years.

This ongoing investigation and the potential ramifications present a necessary opportunity for Americans to reaffirm their commitment to a fair and equitable justice system, truly reflective of our core democratic values.

Sources:
zerohedge.com
dailycaller.com
insurancejournal.com












Latest News