Judge Exposes Truth: Chauvin Trial Misled by Officials
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 4 hours ago
**Justice Served: Judge Rules Police Brass Misled Jury in Chauvin Trial**
In a highly consequential ruling, Minnesota Judge Edward Wahl has dismissed a defamation lawsuit against journalist Liz Collin, revealing significant revelations about the Derek Chauvin trial that have been largely overlooked by mainstream media.
Collin, known for her investigative work in the aftermath of George Floyd's death, faced legal action from Assistant Police Chief Katie Blackwell. Blackwell had asserted that Chauvin's actions during the arrest were not part of Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) training, a claim directly contradicted by evidence presented by Collin and supported by sworn declarations from 33 former and current officers.
The court's decision clarified that Blackwell's statements lacked credibility. Judge Wahl stated that her testimony inviting speculation about Chauvin's methods undermined public trust in the judicial process, especially given the existing evidence that tied Chauvin's techniques to official training.
In a startling 58-page order, Judge Wahl not only dismissed the defamation suit but also mandated Blackwell to pay $75,000 in attorney fees, a move that signals the courts' growing intolerance for individuals attempting to distort the truth for personal or political gain.
This lawsuit marked the first defamation case filed since the passage of the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), which was designed to curb frivolous litigation and uphold the integrity of public discourse. The case serves as a pivotal moment in re-examining how Floyd's death was portrayed and responded to by state officials.
Significantly, this ruling comes at a time when many citizens remain frustrated with accountability in the aftermath of the riots and unrest that followed Floyd's death. The complexity of Chauvin’s trial was further exacerbated by local and national leaders who simultaneously condemned police actions while financially supporting Floyd's family during the jury selection process.
Former officer Tuo Thao, who was also charged in connection to the case, expressed his concerns about the fairness of the proceedings. Thao's insights, shared during a monitored prison call, highlight a troubling double standard. He argued that had the officers involved not been non-black, the entire situation would have been perceived differently, possibly avoiding the chaos that ensued.
Furthermore, evidence suggests that the prosecution may have coerced medical authorities into altering their findings regarding Floyd’s cause of death, further tainting the integrity of the decisions made during this critical period. The medical examiner's original conclusion indicated no signs of asphyxiation, a critical element that was subsequently adjusted under pressure.
The ramifications of this ruling could have broader implications for public trust in judicial processes and law enforcement's reputation amid national debates on police reform and social justice. As America continues to navigate these complex issues, it becomes essential for the truth surrounding these pivotal events to emerge unaltered.
This latest ruling not only substantiates the concerns surrounding the Chauvin trial but also lays the groundwork for future accountability in both law enforcement and media narratives surrounding high-profile cases. The public deserves clarity, transparency, and solutions moving forward, rather than further division and misinformation.
Sources:
wnd.com
westernjournal.com
nypost.com
In a highly consequential ruling, Minnesota Judge Edward Wahl has dismissed a defamation lawsuit against journalist Liz Collin, revealing significant revelations about the Derek Chauvin trial that have been largely overlooked by mainstream media.
Collin, known for her investigative work in the aftermath of George Floyd's death, faced legal action from Assistant Police Chief Katie Blackwell. Blackwell had asserted that Chauvin's actions during the arrest were not part of Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) training, a claim directly contradicted by evidence presented by Collin and supported by sworn declarations from 33 former and current officers.
The court's decision clarified that Blackwell's statements lacked credibility. Judge Wahl stated that her testimony inviting speculation about Chauvin's methods undermined public trust in the judicial process, especially given the existing evidence that tied Chauvin's techniques to official training.
In a startling 58-page order, Judge Wahl not only dismissed the defamation suit but also mandated Blackwell to pay $75,000 in attorney fees, a move that signals the courts' growing intolerance for individuals attempting to distort the truth for personal or political gain.
This lawsuit marked the first defamation case filed since the passage of the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), which was designed to curb frivolous litigation and uphold the integrity of public discourse. The case serves as a pivotal moment in re-examining how Floyd's death was portrayed and responded to by state officials.
Significantly, this ruling comes at a time when many citizens remain frustrated with accountability in the aftermath of the riots and unrest that followed Floyd's death. The complexity of Chauvin’s trial was further exacerbated by local and national leaders who simultaneously condemned police actions while financially supporting Floyd's family during the jury selection process.
Former officer Tuo Thao, who was also charged in connection to the case, expressed his concerns about the fairness of the proceedings. Thao's insights, shared during a monitored prison call, highlight a troubling double standard. He argued that had the officers involved not been non-black, the entire situation would have been perceived differently, possibly avoiding the chaos that ensued.
Furthermore, evidence suggests that the prosecution may have coerced medical authorities into altering their findings regarding Floyd’s cause of death, further tainting the integrity of the decisions made during this critical period. The medical examiner's original conclusion indicated no signs of asphyxiation, a critical element that was subsequently adjusted under pressure.
The ramifications of this ruling could have broader implications for public trust in judicial processes and law enforcement's reputation amid national debates on police reform and social justice. As America continues to navigate these complex issues, it becomes essential for the truth surrounding these pivotal events to emerge unaltered.
This latest ruling not only substantiates the concerns surrounding the Chauvin trial but also lays the groundwork for future accountability in both law enforcement and media narratives surrounding high-profile cases. The public deserves clarity, transparency, and solutions moving forward, rather than further division and misinformation.
Sources:
wnd.com
westernjournal.com
nypost.com
Latest News