Colorado Law Undermines Parental Rights and Free Speech
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 5 hours ago
**Dangerous Overreach: Colorado's New Law Threatens Parental Rights and Free Speech**
In a chilling move for parental rights and individual liberties, Colorado has enacted a law mandating the use of preferred pronouns for transgender individuals, compelling citizens to conform to government-sanctioned speech or face dire consequences.
Signed into law by Democratic Governor Jared Polis, this legislation classifies “deadnaming” and “misgendering” as discriminatory acts under the state’s Anti-Discrimination Act.
Parental rights organizations have swiftly responded by filing a lawsuit, arguing that this law is a blatant violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments, stifling free expression and parental authority.
Sarah Parshall Perry, Vice President of Defending Education, condemned the law in a recent statement, asserting that it “muzzles parents, doctors, and associations alike” who refuse to endorse a government-mandated narrative about gender identity.
According to the lawsuit, the law has profound implications for parents in custody disputes, granting the courts the power to consider failure to use preferred pronouns as “coercive control.” This means parents who oppose gender transition for their children could risk losing custody, a striking intrusion into family matters that should remain private.
The plaintiffs argue that this legislation not only confuses free speech with discrimination but also attempts to suppress traditional beliefs concerning gender—views that many Coloradans hold dear.
Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, chairman of the group Do No Harm, articulated the broader implications, stating, “Abridging Americans’ constitutional right to freedom of expression in the name of radical gender ideology is wrong.” This sentiment echoes concerns that such laws may be used to silence dissent and punish those who dare to voice their beliefs.
In a society that prides itself on freedom of speech and parental rights, this law raises alarm bells.
It demonstrates a growing trend among progressive states to prioritize ideological conformity over individual liberties, ultimately leading to increased government overreach into our everyday lives.
As the legal battle unfolds, the implications of this law could resonate far beyond Colorado, potentially influencing similar legislative efforts across the country.
In defending the rights of parents and individuals to freely express their opinions, the hope remains that the courts will intervene and protect these fundamental American values.
The future of parental rights, free speech, and the ability to challenge government overreach hangs in the balance.
Sources:
dailycaller.com
breitbart.com
slaynews.com
In a chilling move for parental rights and individual liberties, Colorado has enacted a law mandating the use of preferred pronouns for transgender individuals, compelling citizens to conform to government-sanctioned speech or face dire consequences.
Signed into law by Democratic Governor Jared Polis, this legislation classifies “deadnaming” and “misgendering” as discriminatory acts under the state’s Anti-Discrimination Act.
Parental rights organizations have swiftly responded by filing a lawsuit, arguing that this law is a blatant violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments, stifling free expression and parental authority.
Sarah Parshall Perry, Vice President of Defending Education, condemned the law in a recent statement, asserting that it “muzzles parents, doctors, and associations alike” who refuse to endorse a government-mandated narrative about gender identity.
According to the lawsuit, the law has profound implications for parents in custody disputes, granting the courts the power to consider failure to use preferred pronouns as “coercive control.” This means parents who oppose gender transition for their children could risk losing custody, a striking intrusion into family matters that should remain private.
The plaintiffs argue that this legislation not only confuses free speech with discrimination but also attempts to suppress traditional beliefs concerning gender—views that many Coloradans hold dear.
Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, chairman of the group Do No Harm, articulated the broader implications, stating, “Abridging Americans’ constitutional right to freedom of expression in the name of radical gender ideology is wrong.” This sentiment echoes concerns that such laws may be used to silence dissent and punish those who dare to voice their beliefs.
In a society that prides itself on freedom of speech and parental rights, this law raises alarm bells.
It demonstrates a growing trend among progressive states to prioritize ideological conformity over individual liberties, ultimately leading to increased government overreach into our everyday lives.
As the legal battle unfolds, the implications of this law could resonate far beyond Colorado, potentially influencing similar legislative efforts across the country.
In defending the rights of parents and individuals to freely express their opinions, the hope remains that the courts will intervene and protect these fundamental American values.
The future of parental rights, free speech, and the ability to challenge government overreach hangs in the balance.
Sources:
dailycaller.com
breitbart.com
slaynews.com
Latest News